Literature DB >> 24297454

Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Kai Wang1, John D Chodera, Yanzhi Yang, Michael R Shirts.   

Abstract

We present a method to identify small molecule ligand binding sites and poses within a given protein crystal structure using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. The Hamiltonians used vary from the physical end state of protein interacting with the ligand to an unphysical end state where the ligand does not interact with the protein. As replicas explore the space of Hamiltonians interpolating between these states, the ligand can rapidly escape local minima and explore potential binding sites. Geometric restraints keep the ligands from leaving the vicinity of the protein and an alchemical pathway designed to increase phase space overlap between intermediates ensures good mixing. Because of the rigorous statistical mechanical nature of the Hamiltonian exchange framework, we can also extract binding free energy estimates for all putative binding sites. We present results of this methodology applied to the T4 lysozyme L99A model system for three known ligands and one non-binder as a control, using an implicit solvent. We find that our methodology identifies known crystallographic binding sites consistently and accurately for the small number of ligands considered here and gives free energies consistent with experiment. We are also able to analyze the contribution of individual binding sites to the overall binding affinity. Our methodology points to near term potential applications in early-stage structure-guided drug discovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24297454      PMCID: PMC4154199          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-013-9689-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  49 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.

Authors:  Esther Kellenberger; Jordi Rodrigo; Pascal Muller; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-01

3.  POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displaying protein cavities and their surrounding amino acids.

Authors:  D G Levitt; L J Banaszak
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1992-12

4.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Identifying and characterizing binding sites and assessing druggability.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  44 in total

1.  Towards predictive docking at aminergic G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Jan Jakubík; Esam E El-Fakahany; Vladimír Doležal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Homologous ligands accommodated by discrete conformations of a buried cavity.

Authors:  Matthew Merski; Marcus Fischer; Trent E Balius; Oliv Eidam; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Computation of protein-ligand binding free energies using quantum mechanical bespoke force fields.

Authors:  Daniel J Cole; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 5.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Computing Ligands Bound to Proteins Using MELD-Accelerated MD.

Authors:  Cong Liu; Emiliano Brini; Alberto Perez; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Converging free energies of binding in cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid host-guest systems from SAMPL4 using expanded ensemble simulations.

Authors:  Jacob I Monroe; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Trung Hai Nguyen; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.