| Literature DB >> 30271457 |
Ming Liu1, Zhenze Wang2, Anqiang Sun1,3, Xiaoyan Deng1,3.
Abstract
The typical helical flow within the human arterial system is widely used when designing cardiovascular devices, as this helical flow can be generated using the "crossed limbs" strategy of the bifurcated stent graft (BSG) and enhanced by the tapered structure of arteries. Here, we propose the use of a deflected blended bifurcated stent graft (BBSG) with various tapers, using conventional blended BSGs with the same degree of taper as a comparison. Hemodynamic performances, including helical strength and wall shear stress- (WSS-) based indicators, were assessed. Displacement forces that may induce stent-graft migration were assessed using numerical simulations and in vitro experiments. The results showed that as the taper increased, the displacement force, helicity strength, and time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) within the iliac grafts increased, whereas the oscillating shear index (OSI) and relative residence time (RRT) gradually decreased for both types of BBSGs. With identical tapers, deflected BBSGs, compared to conventional BBSGs, exhibited a wider helical structure and lower RRT on the iliac graft and lower displacement force; however, there were no differences in hemodynamic indicators. In summary, the presence of tapering facilitated helical flow and produced better hemodynamic performance but posed a higher risk of graft migration. Conventional and deflected BBSGs with taper might be the two optimal configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair, given the helical flow. The deflected BBSG provides a better configuration, compared to the conventional BBSG, when considering the reduction of migration risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271457 PMCID: PMC6151236 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8054850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1(a) Geometrical models of the ideal conventional and deflected types of blended bifurcated stent grafts (BBSGs) with taper to different degrees. (b) Imposed inlet velocity and outlet pressure waveforms. (c) Mesh presentation in the inlet and bifurcated regions. (d) Schematic presentation of the perfusion system and two types of BBSGs made of semitransparent photosensitive resin created with laser rapid prototyping technology.
Mesh-independent study results.
| Mesh cells | Mesh nodes | Outlet velocity difference (%) | Outlet pressure difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 973,257 | 267,382 | ||
| 1,242,534 | 332,187 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 1,457,826 | 397,248 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| 1,723,820 | 462,861 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Figure 2(a) Helicity isosurfaces of −0.5/0.5 ms−2 under steady-state simulation. (b) Surface contours of helicity at the left iliac graft outlet steady-state simulation. The right-handed helical structure with positive value was colored red, while the left-handed helical structure with negative value was colored blue.
Figure 3Absolute helicity of the left outlet in the pulse cycle during the pulsatile calculations.
Figure 4Distributions of hemodynamic indicators on the six models. (a) WSS contour; (b) TAWSS contour; (c) OSI contour; (d) RRT contour.
Figure 5Area-weighted averages of hemodynamic indices in the iliac grafts of the six models. (a) WSS (Pa); (b) TAWSS (Pa); (c) OSI; (d) RRT (Pa−1).
Figure 6Variation trends of displacement force acting on the BBSG in the pulse cycle.
Displacement forces (N) acting on two types of blended bifurcated stent graft (BBSG) under various degrees of the taper.
| Conventional BBSG | Deflected BBSG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taper (mm) | 17–10 | 17–9 | 17–8 | 17–10 | 17–9 | 17–8 |
| 60 (mmHg) | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.78 ± 0.01 |
| 80 (mmHg) | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 |
| 100 (mmHg) | 1.12 ± 0.03 | 1.17 ± 0.01 | 1.24 ± 0.01 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 1.07 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.01 |