| Literature DB >> 30060505 |
Marcelo D Catarino1, Artur M S Silva2, Susana M Cardoso3.
Abstract
Seaweeds are known to be a good supply of key nutrients including carbohydrates, protein, minerals, polyunsaturated lipids, as well as several other health-promoting compounds capable of acting on a wide spectrum of disorders and/or diseases. While these marine macroalgae are deeply rooted in the East Asian culture and dietary habits, their major application in Western countries has been in the phycocolloid industry. This scenario has however been gradually changing, since seaweed consumption is becoming more common worldwide. Among the numerous edible seaweeds, members of the genus Fucus have a high nutritional value and are considered good sources of dietary fibers and minerals, especially iodine. Additionally, their wealth of bioactive compounds such as fucoidan, phlorotannins, fucoxanthin and others make them strong candidates for multiple therapeutic applications (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-obesity, anti-coagulant, anti-diabetes and others). This review presents an overview of the nutritional and phytochemical composition of Fucus spp., and their claimed biological activities, as well as the beneficial effects associated to their consumption. Furthermore, the use of Fucus seaweeds and/or their components as functional ingredients for formulation of novel and enhanced foods is also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Fucus spp.; bioactivities; fucoidan; fucoxanthin; nutritional value; phlorotannins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30060505 PMCID: PMC6117670 DOI: 10.3390/md16080249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Geographical distribution of Fucus L. © OpenStreetMap contributors (licensed under Open Data Commons Open Database License); GBIF.org (25 July 2018) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.l5mbpr (licensed under CC BY 4.0).
Moisture and macronutrients composition of different Fucus spp.
| Species | Moisture | Carbohydrates | Fiber | Protein | Lipid | Ash | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 80–81 | 26 *–62 | 16 | 10–17 | 0.4–3 | 19–22 | [ |
|
| 71–84 | 34–66 | 4–59 | 1–11 | 1.2–4 | 23–36 | [ |
|
| 82–88 | 63 * | 63 | 10–11 | 1.8–5 | 22 | [ |
|
| N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 3 | N.D. | [ |
| 68–88 | 26–66 | 4–63 | 1–17 | 0.4–5 | 19–36 | [ |
Values are expressed in % DW. * calculated by a differential method subtracting (protein + lipid + ash) from total dry weight; N.D., no data found in the literature.
Polysaccharide composition of Fucus species (% DW). Adapted from [36,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
| Species | Fucoidan | Alginic Acid | Laminaran |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.4–25.7 | 8.4–58.8 | 0.6–7.0 |
|
| 13.0–24.4 | 10.5–22.2 | 1.0–19.0 |
|
| N.D. | 13.0–16.6 | 1.5–6.9 |
|
| 14.6–21.5 | 9.6–23.6 | 2.2 |
|
| 0.8–18.0 | 0.3–20.0 | 0.4–2.7 |
| 0.8–25.7 | 0.3–58.8 | 0.4–19.0 |
Values expressed in % DW; N.D., no data found in the literature.
Figure 2Representative chemical structures of the three main polysaccharides from Fucus: (A) alginic acid; (B–E) fucoidans from F. vesiculosus, F. evanescens, F. distichus and F. serratus, respectively (without representation of acetate groups); (F) G-laminaran; and (G) M-laminaran. Structures redrawn from [3].
Amino acid composition of different Fucus species. Adapted from [142,144,145,146].
| Aminoacid a |
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAA | ||||||
| Thr | 3.91–4.72 | 3.82 | 5.97 | 2.38 | 2.20 | 2.38–5.97 |
| Val | 3.98–4.49 | 3.54 | 6.50 | 5.96 | 1.80 | 3.54–6.50 |
| Met | 1.39–1.74 | 0.74 | 4.78 | 0.17 | N.D. | 0.17–4.78 |
| Ile | 3.06–3.91 | 2.77 | 4.49 | 4.48 | N.D. | 2.77–4.49 |
| Leu | 5.60–6.64 | 4.80 | 4.19 | 7.78 | 1.80 | 4.19–7.78 |
| Phe | 3.25–4.17 | 2.99 | 2.78 | 3.86 | 3.50 | 2.78–3.90 |
| Lys | 3.95–6.16 | 3.54 | 4.96 | 5.85 | 1.50 | 4.08–5.85 |
| His | 1.36–1.70 | 1.24 | 1.89 | 1.48 | N.D. | 1.24–1.89 |
| NEAA | ||||||
| Asp | 7.98–12.91 | 9.88 | 12.05 | 13.85 | 4.50 | 7.98–13.85 |
| Ser | 3.76–4.85 | 3.58 | 6.79 | 5.96 | 1.20 | 3.58–6.79 |
| Glu | 9.10–24.28 | 31.47 | 16.30 | 24.46 | 26.00 | 9.10–31.47 |
| Pro | 3.33–4.43 | 2.76 | 3.01 | 5.00 | 2.76–3.71 | |
| Gly | 4.06–5.01 | 3.63 | 10.16 | 6.75 | 2.20 | 3.63–10.16 |
| Ala | 4.93–7.59 | 6.08 | 11.05 | 11.58 | 32.00 | 4.93–11.58 |
| Tyr | 1.50–2.52 | 2.99 | 1.36 | 1.42 | 2.50 | 1.36–2.14 |
| Arg | 4.38–4.56 | 3.94 | 1.59 | 2.95 | 2.00 | 1.59–4.56 |
Values are expressed as g/100 g protein. a Trp and Cys are missing from this table because methods used by the authors do not allow to analyze the contents of these two amino acids. b Values for F. evanescens are expressed in % DW. c Range values in Fucus spp. column do not contemplate the values of F. evanescens. EAA, essential amino acids; NEAA, non-essential amino acids, N.D., no data found in the literature.
Fatty acid profile of different Fucus species. Adapted from [24,28,37,38,149,152,153,154,155,156].
| Fatty Acid |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFA | 24.3–34.0 | 33.6–53.2 | 26.9–33.5 | 30.3–35.4 | 29.4 | 27.6 | 24.3–53.2 |
| C10:0 | 2.8–18.8 | 3.2–12.9 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 2.8–18.8 |
| C12:0 | 0.5–0.7 | tr–1.0 | 0.3–0.7 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | tr–1.0 |
| C13:0 | 7.5–14.4 | 11.7 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 11.7 |
| C14:0 | 12.4 | 1.3–15.5 | 6.4–10.9 | 14.2–14.9 | 8.4 | 11 | 1.3–15.5 |
| C15:0 | N.D. | 0.3 | N.D. | N.D. | 0.6 | N.D. | 0.3–0.6 |
| C16:0 | 9.6–17.7 | 13.6–18.8 | 18.9–29.2 | 12.3–14.9 | 19.6 | 15.8 | 9.6–29.2 |
| C18:0 | 0.6–2.2 | 0.6–0.8 | 0.9–1.7 | 1.6–2.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6–2.8 |
| C20:0 | tr | 0.5 | tr–0.5 | 2.1–2.9 | N.D. | 0.2 | tr–2.9 |
| C21:0 | N.D. | 0.6–7.6 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 0.6–7.6 |
| C22:0 | tr | tr–0.7 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | tr–0.7 |
| MUFA | 23.8–47.1 | 15.4–27.1 | 27.2–41.3 | 34.5–35.2 | 18.5 | 39.3 | 15.4–41.3 |
| C14:1, ω5 | 0.2–1.3 | 0.1–0.6 | 0.3–0.9 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 0.1–1.3 |
| C16:1, ω7 | 0.9–1.5 | 1.1 | tr–9.5 | 1.3–1.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | tr–9.5 |
| C18:1, ω9 | 21.3–46.9 | 14.3–33.3 | 11.4–41.3 | 32.1–33.9 | 16.7 | 38.1 | 11.4–46.9 |
| PUFA | 25.8–42.5 | 31.4–39.0 | 28.2–39.4 | 24.2–29.7 | 48.5 | 29.9 | 24.2–48.5 |
| C18:2, ω6 | 7.5–10.0 | 6.4–11.7 | 7.6–14.2 | 3.1–3.8 | 7.7 | 13.2 | 3.1–14.2 |
| C18:3, ω6 | 2.7–5.0 | tr–9.4 | 0.6–9.7 | 0.2–0.31.5–2.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.2–9.4 |
| C18:3, ω3 | N.D. | 7.5 | 2.9 | tr–7.5 | |||
| C18:4, ω3 | 2.2–3.2 | N.D. | 1.5–11.1 | 0.8–1.3 | 6.7 | 1.2 | 0.8–11.1 |
| C20:2, ω6 | tr–0.9 | 0.3–0.4 | tr | N.D. | 0.6 | N.D. | tr–0.9 |
| C20:3, ω6 | tr–1.0 | 14.3 | tr | 0.8–1.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | tr–14.3 |
| C20:3, ω3 | N.D. | 11.7–14.8 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 0.2 | 11.7–14.8 |
| C20:4, ω6 | 7.4–13.1 | 0.4 | 9.1–16.4 | 9.6–15.1 | 14.1 | 8.7 | 0.4–16.4 |
| C20:5, ω3 | 3.7–7.3 | 1.1–6.8 | 3.9–15.8 | 5.7–8.1 | 10.9 | 2.1 | 1.1–15.8 |
| C22:6, ω3 | 0.7–2.1 | 1.3–3.3 | 0.8–3.6 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 0.7–3.6 |
| ω3 | 8.6–24.0 | 14.0–14.8 | 9–22.4 | 9.2–9.3 | 25.7 | 6.4 | 6.4–25.7 |
| ω6 | 17.2–20.6 | 9.6–24.9 | 16.8–22.0 | 15–20.4 | 23.4 | 23.5 | 9.6–24.9 |
| ω6/ω3 | 0.9–2.0 | 0.7–1.8 | 0.9–2.4 | 1.6–2.1 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 0.7–3.7 |
Values expressed in percent of total fatty acid. SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; tr, trace; N.D., no data found in the literature.
Major mineral and trace elements in different Fucus spp. Adapted from [24,154,160,164,165,166,167,168].
| Element |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na | 630–5469 | 1429 | 2305 | N.D. | 630–5469 |
| K | 1100–4322 | 976 | 2490 | N.D. | 976–4322 |
| Ca | 938–2150 | 118–1049 | 1284–2175 | 895 | 118–2175 |
| Mg | 740–994 | 163–819 | 724–844 | 702 | 163–994 |
| Fe | 4.2–49 | 52 | 31 | 13 | 4.2–52 |
| Cu | 0.2–1.4 | 0.2 | 0.3–1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2–1.4 |
| Zn | 2.6–28 | 15 | 5.3–29 | 4.5 | 2.6–29 |
| Mn | 3.4–6.6 | 6.3 | 14–29 | 11 | 3.4–29 |
| I | 13–73 | 23.3 | 32 | 27 | 13–73 |
| Na/K | 0.6–1.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 | N.D. | 0.6–1.5 |
Data expressed in mg/100 g DW. N.D., no data found in the literature.
Figure 3Representative chemical structure of: (A) vitamin E; (B) vitamin C; (C) vitamin A; and (D) fucoxanthin. Structures redrawn from [3,186,187,188]
Figure 4Examples of phlorotannin structures grouped according to their type of linkage. Structures redrawn from [251,252].
Effect of functional foods enriched with Fucus components.
| Functional Food | Functional Ingredient | Quantities | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk | 0.25% and 0.5% | - Extract was stable in milk and provided antioxidant activity before and after in vitro digestion, but not in cells | [ | |
| Yogurt | 0.25% and 0.5% | - No influence on product’s acidity, microbiology or whey separation parameters | [ | |
| Fish cakes | 3.7 and 3.8 g/100 g (H2O and EtOH extract, respectively) | - No off-flavors and lower rancid odor and flavor | [ | |
| Cod muscle | EtOAc fraction of | 300 mg PGE/kg | - Application of seaweed extract acted against lipid oxidation in fish muscle foods. | [ |
| Cod mince | 300 mg/kg | - Phlorotannin-rich fractions had higher inhibitory impact on lipid peroxidation than crude 80% ethanol extracts | [ | |
| Cod protein hydrolysates | 62.0 g PGE/100 g | - Decreased lipid hydroperoxide and TBARS values during protein hydrolyzation | [ | |
| Cod bone mince protein hydrolysates | 0.16 g PGE/L of 3.7% ( | - Prevented lipid oxidation during protein hydrolysates freeze drying | [ | |
| Minced horse mackerel | 1% and 2% | - Prevented lipid oxidation during 5 months of storage at −20 °C. | [ | |
| Fish-oil-enriched granola bars | 0.5 and 1.0 g/100 g | - The highest antioxidant effect and lipid stability improvement was observed for EtOH and ACN extracts at 0.5 g/100 g. | [ | |
| Fish-oil-enriched milk and mayonnaise | 1.0–2.0 g/100 g | - EtOAc fraction caused significant improvement of milk’s lipid stability in a dose-dependent fashion, decreasing the degradation of EPA and DHA and subsequent secondary degradation products | [ | |
| Fish-oil-enriched mayonnaise | 1.5 and 2.0 g/kg | - The higher the concentration, the better the inhibitory effect of EtOH and ACN extracts against lipid oxidation. | [ | |
| Canola oil | 500 ppm | - Peroxide, | [ |
ACN, acetone; EtOH, etanol; EtOAc, ethyl acetate; PGE, phloroglucinol equivalents; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; CAN, acetonitrile.