Literature DB >> 30012694

Emergence of an Adaptive Command for Orienting Behavior in Premotor Brainstem Neurons of Barn Owls.

Fanny Cazettes1,2, Brian J Fischer3, Michael V Beckert1, Jose L Pena4.   

Abstract

The midbrain map of auditory space commands sound-orienting responses in barn owls. Owls precisely localize sounds in frontal space but underestimate the direction of peripheral sound sources. This bias for central locations was proposed to be adaptive to the decreased reliability in the periphery of sensory cues used for sound localization by the owl. Understanding the neural pathway supporting this biased behavior provides a means to address how adaptive motor commands are implemented by neurons. Here we find that the sensory input for sound direction is weighted by its reliability in premotor neurons of the midbrain tegmentum of owls (male and female), such that the mean population firing rate approximates the head-orienting behavior. We provide evidence that this coding may emerge through convergence of upstream projections from the midbrain map of auditory space. We further show that manipulating the sensory input yields changes predicted by the convergent network in both premotor neural responses and behavior. This work demonstrates how a topographic sensory representation can be linearly read out to adjust behavioral responses by the reliability of the sensory input.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This research shows how statistics of the sensory input can be integrated into a behavioral command by readout of a sensory representation. The firing rate of midbrain premotor neurons receiving sensory information from a topographic representation of auditory space is weighted by the reliability of sensory cues. We show that these premotor responses are consistent with a weighted convergence from the topographic sensory representation. This convergence was also tested behaviorally, where manipulation of stimulus properties led to bidirectional changes in sound localization errors. Thus a topographic representation of auditory space is translated into a premotor command for sound localization that is modulated by sensory reliability.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387270-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive behavior; barn owl; behavioral bias; hearing; sensory reliability; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30012694      PMCID: PMC6096042          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0947-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Converting neural signals from place codes to rate codes.

Authors:  J M Groh
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  S du Lac; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of interaural decorrelation on neural and behavioral detection of spatial cues.

Authors:  K Saberi; Y Takahashi; M Konishi; Y Albeck; B J Arthur; H Farahbod
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Sound localization behavior in ferrets: comparison of acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses.

Authors:  F R Nodal; V M Bajo; C H Parsons; J W Schnupp; A J King
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution.

Authors:  Jan W H Schnupp; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Cue Reliability Represented in the Shape of Tuning Curves in the Owl's Sound Localization System.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Authors:  Gianmarco Maldarelli; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Kettler; Janie M Ondracek; Harald Luksch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Barn Owl's Auditory Space Map Activity Matching Conditions for a Population Vector Readout to Drive Adaptive Sound-Localizing Behavior.

Authors:  Roland Ferger; Keanu Shadron; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Effect of Stimulus-Dependent Spike Timing on Population Coding of Sound Location in the Owl's Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  M V Beckert; B J Fischer; J L Pena
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Paula Kuokkanen; Jamie Emoto Matthews; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The barn owls' Minimum Audible Angle.

Authors:  Bianca Krumm; Georg M Klump; Christine Köppl; Ulrike Langemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Natural ITD statistics predict human auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pavão; Elyse S Sussman; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.