Literature DB >> 19261709

Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Katrin Vonderschen1, Hermann Wagner.   

Abstract

Barn owls process sound-localization information in two parallel pathways, the midbrain and the forebrain pathway. Exctracellular recordings of neural responses to auditory stimuli from far advanced stations of these pathways, the auditory arcopallium in the forebrain and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain, demonstrated that the representations of interaural time difference and frequency in the forebrain pathway differ from those in the midbrain pathway. Specifically, low-frequency representation was conserved in the forebrain pathway, while it was lost in the midbrain pathway. Variation of interaural time difference yielded symmetrical tuning curves in the midbrain pathway. By contrast, the typical forebrain-tuning curve was asymmetric with a steep slope crossing zero time difference and a less-steep slope toward larger contralateral time disparities. Low sound frequencies contributed sensitivity to contralateral leading sounds underlying these asymmetries, whereas high frequencies enhanced the steepness of slopes at small interaural time differences. Furthermore, the peaks of time-disparity tuning curves were wider in the forebrain than in the midbrain. The distribution of the steepest slopes of best interaural time differences in the auditory arcopallium, but not in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, was centered at zero time difference. The distribution observed in the auditory arocpallium is reminiscent of the situation observed in small mammals. We speculate that the forebrain representation may serve as a population code supporting fine discrimination of central interaural time differences and coarse indication of laterality of a stimulus for large interaural time differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19261709     DOI: 10.1152/jn.91196.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The neural representation of interaural time differences in gerbils is transformed from midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Lucile A C Belliveau; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Linear summation in the barn owl's brainstem underlies responses to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Estimating characteristic phase and delay from broadband interaural time difference tuning curves.

Authors:  Jessica Lehmann; Philipp Tellers; Hermann Wagner; Hartmut Führ
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Biophysics of directional hearing in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Jennifer L Thornton; Heath G Jones; Kanthaiah Koka; Bruce A Young; Christian Brandt; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.