Literature DB >> 9808465

Effects of interaural decorrelation on neural and behavioral detection of spatial cues.

K Saberi1, Y Takahashi, M Konishi, Y Albeck, B J Arthur, H Farahbod.   

Abstract

The detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localization critically depends on the similarity between the left and right ear signals (interaural correlation). We show that, like humans, owls can localize phantom sound sources well until the correlation declines to a very low value, below which their performance rapidly deteriorates. Decreasing interaural correlation also causes the response of the owl's tectal auditory neurons to decline nonlinearly, with a rapid drop followed by a more gradual reduction. A detection-theoretic analysis of the statistical properties of neuronal responses could account for the variance of behavioral responses as interaural correlation is decreased. Finally, cross-correlation analysis suggests that low interaural correlations cause misalignment of cross-correlation peaks across different frequencies, contributing heavily to the nonlinear decline in neural and ultimately behavioral performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9808465     DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80595-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  31 in total

1.  Neural sensitivity to interaural time differences: beyond the Jeffress model.

Authors:  D C Fitzpatrick; S Kuwada; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Robustness of multiplicative processes in auditory spatial tuning.

Authors:  José Luis Peña; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sensitivity to interaural correlation of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Robert H Arnott; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Sound localization in the alligator.

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Dylan Rich; Fanny Cazettes; Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Envelope contributions to the representation of interaural time difference in the forebrain of barn owls.

Authors:  Philipp Tellers; Jessica Lehmann; Hartmut Führ; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Behavioral sensitivity to broadband binaural localization cues in the ferret.

Authors:  Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Kohilan Gananandan; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.