Literature DB >> 35508384

Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Gianmarco Maldarelli1, Uwe Firzlaff1, Lutz Kettler1, Janie M Ondracek1, Harald Luksch2.   

Abstract

The optic tectum (OT) is an avian midbrain structure involved in the integration of visual and auditory stimuli. Studies in the barn owl, an auditory specialist, have shown that spatial auditory information is topographically represented in the OT. Little is known about how auditory space is represented in the midbrain of birds with generalist hearing, i.e., most of avian species lacking peripheral adaptations such as facial ruffs or asymmetric ears. Thus, we conducted in vivo extracellular recordings of single neurons in the OT and in the external portion of the formatio reticularis lateralis (FRLx), a brain structure located between the inferior colliculus (IC) and the OT, in anaesthetized chickens of either sex. We found that most of the auditory spatial receptive fields (aSRFs) were spatially confined both in azimuth and elevation, divided into two main classes: round aSRFs, mainly present in the OT, and annular aSRFs, with a ring-like shape around the interaural axis, mainly present in the FRLx. Our data further indicate that interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) play a role in the formation of both aSRF classes. These results suggest that, unlike mammals and owls which have a congruent representation of visual and auditory space in the OT, generalist birds separate the computation of auditory space in two different midbrain structures. We hypothesize that the FRLx-annular aSRFs define the distance of a sound source from the axis of the lateral visual fovea, whereas the OT-round aSRFs are involved in multimodal integration of the stimulus around the lateral fovea.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Previous studies implied that auditory spatial receptive fields (aSRFs) in the midbrain of generalist birds are only confined along azimuth. Interestingly, we found SRFs s in the chicken to be confined along both azimuth and elevation. Moreover, the auditory receptive fields are arranged in a concentric manner around the overlapping interaural and visual axes. These data suggest that in generalist birds, which mainly rely on vision, the auditory system mainly serves to align auditory stimuli with the visual axis, while auditory specialized birds like the barn owl compute sound sources more precisely and integrate sound positions in the multimodal space map of the optic tectum (OT).
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRLx; auditory system; avian midbrain; optic tectum

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35508384      PMCID: PMC9186802          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  43 in total

1.  Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Superadditivity in multisensory integration: putting the computation in context.

Authors:  Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Role of intracranial cavities in avian directional hearing.

Authors:  Ole Næsbye Larsen; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Kenneth Kragh Jensen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Subdivisions of the inferior colliculus in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  On hearing with more than one ear: lessons from evolution.

Authors:  Jan W H Schnupp; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Binaural responses in the auditory midbrain of chicken (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Roberta Aralla; Go Ashida; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Multimodal integration in the chicken.

Authors:  Josine Verhaal; Harald Luksch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Mapping of the receptive fields in the optic tectum of chicken (Gallus gallus) using sparse noise.

Authors:  Josine Verhaal; Harald Luksch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.