Literature DB >> 14724638

Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Konrad P Körding1, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

When we learn a new motor skill, such as playing an approaching tennis ball, both our sensors and the task possess variability. Our sensors provide imperfect information about the ball's velocity, so we can only estimate it. Combining information from multiple modalities can reduce the error in this estimate. On a longer time scale, not all velocities are a priori equally probable, and over the course of a match there will be a probability distribution of velocities. According to bayesian theory, an optimal estimate results from combining information about the distribution of velocities-the prior-with evidence from sensory feedback. As uncertainty increases, when playing in fog or at dusk, the system should increasingly rely on prior knowledge. To use a bayesian strategy, the brain would need to represent the prior distribution and the level of uncertainty in the sensory feedback. Here we control the statistical variations of a new sensorimotor task and manipulate the uncertainty of the sensory feedback. We show that subjects internally represent both the statistical distribution of the task and their sensory uncertainty, combining them in a manner consistent with a performance-optimizing bayesian process. The central nervous system therefore employs probabilistic models during sensorimotor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14724638     DOI: 10.1038/nature02169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  541 in total

1.  Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad Paul Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Energy-based stochastic control of neural mass models suggests time-varying effective connectivity in the resting state.

Authors:  Roberto C Sotero; Amir Shmuel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Error-driven learning in statistical summary perception.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Default brain functionality in blind people.

Authors:  H Burton; A Z Snyder; M E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.

Authors:  Brett Vintch; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.