Literature DB >> 18281159

Sound localization behavior in ferrets: comparison of acoustic orientation and approach-to-target responses.

F R Nodal1, V M Bajo, C H Parsons, J W Schnupp, A J King.   

Abstract

Auditory localization experiments typically either require subjects to judge the location of a sound source from a discrete set of response alternatives or involve measurements of the accuracy of orienting responses made toward the source location. To compare the results obtained by both methods, we trained ferrets by positive conditioning to stand on a platform at the center of a circular arena prior to stimulus presentation and then approach the source of a broadband noise burst delivered from 1 of 12 loudspeakers arranged at 30 degrees intervals in the horizontal plane. Animals were rewarded for making a correct choice. We also obtained a non-categorized measure of localization accuracy by recording head-orienting movements made during the first second following stimulus onset. The accuracy of the approach-to-target responses declined as the stimulus duration was reduced, particularly for lateral and posterior locations, although responses to sounds presented in the frontal region of space and directly behind the animal remained quite accurate. Head movements had a latency of approximately 200 ms and varied systematically in amplitude with stimulus direction. However, the final head bearing progressively undershot the target with increasing eccentricity and rarely exceeded 60 degrees to each side of the midline. In contrast to the approach-to-target responses, the accuracy of the head orienting responses did not change much with stimulus duration, suggesting that the improvement in percent correct scores with longer stimuli was due, at least in part, to re-sampling of the acoustical stimulus after the initial head turn had been made. Nevertheless, for incorrect trials, head orienting responses were more closely correlated with the direction approached by the animals than with the actual target direction, implying that at least part of the neural circuitry for translating sensory spatial signals into motor commands is shared by these two behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18281159      PMCID: PMC7116516          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  46 in total

1.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to coordinated eye and head movements.

Authors:  D L Sparks; E G Freedman; L L Chen; N J Gandhi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A quantitative study of auditory-evoked saccadic eye movements in two dimensions.

Authors:  M A Frens; A J Van Opstal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparative study of sound localization and its anatomical correlates in mammals.

Authors:  R S Heffner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1997

4.  Spectral cues for sound localization in cats: effects of frequency domain on minimum audible angles in the median and horizontal planes.

Authors:  A Y Huang; B J May
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sound localization acuity in the cat: effect of azimuth, signal duration, and test procedure.

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Brain stem auditory pathways involved in reflexive head orientation to sound.

Authors:  G C Thompson; R B Masterton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Monkey sound localization: head-restrained versus head-unrestrained orienting.

Authors:  Luis C Populin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Behavioral studies of sound localization in the cat.

Authors:  L C Populin; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Location coding by opponent neural populations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ian A Harrington; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  35 in total

1.  Gaze shifts to auditory and visual stimuli in cats.

Authors:  Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-08

2.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Chronic detachable headphones for acoustic stimulation in freely moving animals.

Authors:  Fernando R Nodal; Peter Keating; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Influence of double stimulation on sound-localization behavior in barn owls.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Amal Isaiah; Tara Vongpaisal; Andrew J King; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The precedence effect and its buildup and breakdown in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Sandra Tolnai; Ruth Y Litovsky; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Behavioral sensitivity to broadband binaural localization cues in the ferret.

Authors:  Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Kohilan Gananandan; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25

8.  Brief sounds evoke prolonged responses in anesthetized ferret auditory cortex.

Authors:  Robert A A Campbell; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Tara Vongpaisal; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd; Andrew J King; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.