Literature DB >> 30003698

Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Martin G Myers1, Roland Asmar2, Jan A Staessen3,4.   

Abstract

Measurement of blood pressure (BP) using the auscultatory method must follow specific rules and conditions to be reliable. Nonetheless, these requirements are often not followed in clinical practice, resulting in inaccurate BP readings. Simply replacing manual sphygmomanometers with an oscillometric device may still produce readings that are associated with a white coat effect. These limitations can be overcome by using an oscillometric sphygmomanometer that automatically records multiple readings with the patient resting quietly and alone, called automated office (AO)BP. AOBP produces office readings with a reduced white coat effect, which are also similar to the awake ambulatory BP. There is also evidence that AOBP is a better predictor of target organ damage than attended office BP. Furthermore, clinical outcome data support AOBP as having both a similar diagnostic threshold as awake ambulatory BP and a lower treatment target. Using AOBP in clinical practice simplifies recording office BP by not requiring an additional period of rest before activation of the device and by not having staff present during the actual measurements. Recent studies have reported that automatic BP measurements taken by staff in research studies with close adherence to guidelines using AOBP devices may produce similar readings to AOBP. Further research is needed to determine the best method for recording BP at systolic targets < 130 mm Hg and the relationship of office BP to ambulatory BP and home BP. ©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated sphygmomanometers; blood pressure; hypertension diagnosis; measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30003698      PMCID: PMC8030786          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso; Alexander Kiss
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with inclusion criteria for the SPRINT trial.

Authors:  Alejandro de la Sierra; José R Banegas; Juan A Divisón; Manuel Gorostidi; Ernest Vinyoles; Juan J de la Cruz; Julián Segura; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-11-05

4.  Comparison of blood pressure measurements using an automated blood pressure device in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Larry W Chambers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Susan O'Rielly; Sandra Ignagni; Stephen J C Hearps
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-04-09

5.  Attended Versus Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement in a Real Life Setting.

Authors:  Frederic Bauer; Felix S Seibert; Benjamin Rohn; Klaus A R Bauer; Eckart Rolshoven; Nina Babel; Timm H Westhoff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Thresholds for Diagnosing Hypertension Based on Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski; J Michael Paterson; Lisa Dolovich; Karen Tu
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Authors:  Karen C Johnson; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Jeffrey A Cutler; Gregory W Evans; Joni K Snyder; Walter T Ambrosius; Srinivasan Beddhu; Alfred K Cheung; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis; Mahboob Rahman; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; F Curry Grant; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07

9.  Improving cardiovascular health at population level: 39 community cluster randomised trial of Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP).

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry W Chambers; Lisa Dolovich; J Michael Paterson; Tina Karwalajtys; Tracy Gierman; Barbara Farrell; Beatrice McDonough; Lehana Thabane; Karen Tu; Brandon Zagorski; Ron Goeree; Cheryl A Levitt; William Hogg; Stephanie Laryea; Megan Ann Carter; Dana Cross; Rolf J Sabaldt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07

10.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Implementing Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Daniel W Jones
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.

Authors:  Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski; Maciej Siński; Zbigniew Gaciong
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Nocturnal systolic hypertension is a risk factor for cardiac damage in the untreated masked hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Jianhao Li; Yalin Cao; Chen Liu; Jiayong Li; Fengjuan Yao; Yugang Dong; Huiling Huang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Achieving reliable blood pressure measurements in clinical practice: It's time to meet the challenge.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Eamon Dolan; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Roland Asmar; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Barriers to blood pressure control initiatives: Regional diversity, inadequate measurement techniques, guideline inconsistencies, and health disparities.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Race-Specific Comparisons of Antihypertensive and Metabolic Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone.

Authors:  Lakshmi Manasa S Chekka; Arlene B Chapman; John G Gums; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.928

8.  Preference of blood pressure measurement methods by primary care doctors in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Eric Kam Pui Lee; Ryan Chun Ming Choi; Licheng Liu; Tiffany Gao; Benjamin Hon Kei Yip; Samuel Yeung Shan Wong
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  The Need for Accurate Data on Blood Pressure Measurement in the Dental Office.

Authors:  Merrill F Elias; Amanda L Goodell
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Long-term blood pressure trajectories and incident atrial fibrillation in women and men: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina Sharashova; Tom Wilsgaard; Jocasta Ball; Bente Morseth; Eva Gerdts; Laila A Hopstock; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Henrik Schirmer; Maja-Lisa Løchen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.