Literature DB >> 27038200

A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Martin G Myers1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27038200      PMCID： PMC8032015          DOI： 10.1111/jch.12820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN： 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  42 in total

1.  Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults.

Authors:  W B White; Y A Anwar
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso; Alexander Kiss
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 4.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Comparison of blood pressure measurements using an automated blood pressure device in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Larry W Chambers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Susan O'Rielly; Sandra Ignagni; Stephen J C Hearps
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-04-09

6.  A proposed algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using automated office blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Results of the Ontario survey on the prevalence and control of hypertension.

Authors:  Frans H H Leenen; Jean Dumais; Natalie H McInnis; Penelope Turton; Lori Stratychuk; Kathleen Nemeth; Margaret Moy Lum-Kwong; George Fodor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.

Authors:  J W Graves; C Nash; K Burger; K Bailey; S G Sheps
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  SPRINT Trial Results: Latest News in Hypertension Management.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Lawrence J Fine; Jackson T Wright; David M Reboussin; Karen C Johnson; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; F Curry Grant; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07
View more
  35 in total

1.  Potential Deaths Averted and Serious Adverse Events Incurred From Adoption of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen in the United States: Projections From NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Holly Kramer; Rasha Khatib; Srinivasan Beddhu; Alfred K Cheung; Rachel Hess; Vinod K Bansal; Guichan Cao; Jerry Yee; Andrew E Moran; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Paul Muntner; Richard S Cooper
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Limitations in the Methodology Assessing Blood Pressure and the Need for Strict Exclusion Criteria-Reply.

Authors:  Robert D Brook; Masako Morishita
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  It is Time to Change How We Measure Blood Pressures in the Office.

Authors:  Lee A Green
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Pros and Cons of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering.

Authors:  Holly Kramer; Richard Cooper
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Implementing Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Daniel W Jones
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  The 2017 Focused Update of the Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and the Taiwan Hypertension Society (THS) for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Chern-En Chiang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Hung-I Yeh; Ping-Yen Liu; Hao-Min Cheng; Ting-Hsing Chao; Chen-Huan Chen; Kou-Gi Shyu; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Chung-Yin Chen; Pao-Hsien Chu; Shih-Hsien Sung; Kang-Ling Wang; Yi-Heng Li; Kuo-Yang Wang; Fu-Tien Chiang; Wen-Ter Lai; Jyh-Hong Chen; Wen-Jone Chen; San-Jou Yeh; Ming-Fong Chen; Shing-Jong Lin; Jiunn-Lee Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.672

7.  Hypertension.

Authors:  James Brian Byrd; Robert D Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  An Update on Masked Hypertension.

Authors:  D Edmund Anstey; Daniel Pugliese; Marwah Abdalla; Natalie A Bello; Raymond Givens; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.