Literature DB >> 25077100

Comparison of blood pressure measurements using an automated blood pressure device in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices: a randomized controlled trial.

Larry W Chambers1, Janusz Kaczorowski2, Susan O'Rielly3, Sandra Ignagni4, Stephen J C Hearps5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is the foundation of appropriate diagnosis, treatment and ongoing management of hypertension. The use of automated blood pressure devices in community settings such as pharmacies provide opportunities for additional blood pressure measurement; however, it is important to ensure that these measurements are comparable to those taken in physicians' offices using the same devices. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess whether blood pressure readings assessed by use of an automated device differed according to the setting, specifically in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices.
METHODS: We included adults aged 65 years and older who did not live in long-term care facilities or in hospital. The trial was administered by volunteer peer health educators, family physicians and pharmacists in 2 midsized communities in Ontario from April to September 2010. The 5 participating family physicians mailed invitations to their eligible patients. Those who gave informed consent were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 assessment sequences: group A had their blood pressure measured at their physician's office, then at a pharmacy, then again at their physician's office; those in group B had their blood pressure measured at a pharmacy, then at their physician's office, then again at a pharmacy. An automated blood pressure device (BpTRU) was used in both settings. We calculated the differences in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and we compared the readings at both settings and by sequence of assessment.
RESULTS: In total, 275 adults completed the trial (mean age 75.9 yr, 49.5% male, 46.9% with a self-reported diagnosis of hypertension). There were no statistically significant differences in systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurements associated with the sequence of assessment or the setting. There was a significant difference in the overall mean systolic blood pressure between the 2 assessment sequences (group A 122.0 v. group B 127.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001).
INTERPRETATION: Automated devices used in pharmacies to measure blood pressure provide accurate and valid information that can be used in the diagnosis and management of hypertension among older adults in the community. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.controlled-trials.com, no. ISRCTN91799042.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25077100      PMCID: PMC3985967          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20130005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  12 in total

1.  Development of predictive models for long-term cardiovascular risk associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Robert J Glynn; Gilbert J L'Italien; Howard D Sesso; Elizabeth A Jackson; Julie E Buring
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Review of services provided by pharmacies that promote healthy living.

Authors:  David Brown; Jane Portlock; Paul Rutter
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Blood pressure and the global burden of disease 2000. Part II: estimates of attributable burden.

Authors:  Carlene M M Lawes; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Malcolm R Law; Paul Elliott; Stephen MacMahon; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.

Authors:  Kevin E Thorpe; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew D Oxman; Shaun Treweek; Curt D Furberg; Douglas G Altman; Sean Tunis; Eduardo Bergel; Ian Harvey; David J Magid; Kalipso Chalkidou
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001.

Authors:  Carlene M M Lawes; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; F Curry Grant; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07

8.  Improving cardiovascular health at population level: 39 community cluster randomised trial of Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP).

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry W Chambers; Lisa Dolovich; J Michael Paterson; Tina Karwalajtys; Tracy Gierman; Barbara Farrell; Beatrice McDonough; Lehana Thabane; Karen Tu; Brandon Zagorski; Ron Goeree; Cheryl A Levitt; William Hogg; Stephanie Laryea; Megan Ann Carter; Dana Cross; Rolf J Sabaldt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07

9.  A randomized trial of mail vs. telephone invitation to a community-based cardiovascular health awareness program for older family practice patients [ISRCTN61739603].

Authors:  Tina Karwalajtys; Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry W Chambers; Cheryl Levitt; Lisa Dolovich; Bea McDonough; Christopher Patterson; James E Williams
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Distribution of major health risks: findings from the Global Burden of Disease study.

Authors:  Anthony Rodgers; Majid Ezzati; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Alan D Lopez; Ruey-Bin Lin; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines for pharmacists: An update.

Authors:  Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Sherilyn K D Houle; Raj Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2016-10-06

3.  Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Roland Asmar; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Murray Matangi; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Attendance, activation and health profiles of participants, a prospective study on a regional cardiometabolic disease self-management program in Laval, Canada.

Authors:  Magali Girard; Janusz Kaczorowski; Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Vivianne Martin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Roerecke; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 44.409

7.  Personalized Hypertension Management Using Patient-Generated Health Data Integrated With Electronic Health Records (EMPOWER-H): Six-Month Pre-Post Study.

Authors:  Nan Lv; Lan Xiao; Martha L Simmons; Lisa G Rosas; Albert Chan; Martin Entwistle
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Albasri; Jack W OʼSullivan; Nia W Roberts; Suman Prinjha; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  The impact of a cardiovascular health awareness program (CHAP) on reducing blood pressure: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chenglin Ye; Gary Foster; Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry W Chambers; Ricardo Angeles; Francine Marzanek-Lefebvre; Stephanie Laryea; Lehana Thabane; Lisa Dolovich
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.