Literature DB >> 29987663

Optimized Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap for Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Joanna A Hogan1, Martin F Jarrold2.   

Abstract

In charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS), ions are passed through a detection tube and the m/z ratio and charge are determined for each ion. The uncertainty in the charge and m/z determinations can be dramatically reduced by embedding the detection tube in an electrostatic linear ion trap (ELIT) so that ions oscillate back and forth through the detection tube. The resulting time domain signal can be analyzed by fast Fourier transforms (FFTs). The ion's m/z is proportional to the square of the oscillation frequency, and its charge is derived from the FFT magnitude. The ion oscillation frequency is dependent on the physical dimensions of the trap as well as the ion energy. A new ELIT has been designed for CDMS using the central particle method. In the new design, the kinetic energy dependence of the ion oscillation frequency is reduced by an order of magnitude. An order of magnitude reduction in energy dependence should have led to an order of magnitude reduction in the uncertainty of the m/z determination. In practice, a factor of four improvements was achieved. This discrepancy is probably mainly due to the trajectory dependence of the ion oscillation frequency. The new ELIT design uses a duty cycle of 50%. We show that a 50% duty cycle produces the lowest uncertainty in the charge determination. This is due to the absence of even-numbered harmonics in the FFT, which in turn leads to an increase in the magnitude of the peak at the fundamental frequency. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDMS; Charge detection mass spectrometry; ELIT; Electrostatic linear ion trap; Ion trap

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987663     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-2007-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  36 in total

Review 1.  Single-molecule mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.946

2.  Improving the quality of the ion beam exiting a quadrupole ion guide.

Authors:  Vadym D Berkout; Vladimir M Doroshenko
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Negative droplets from positive electrospray.

Authors:  Joshua T Maze; Thaddeus C Jones; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Mass and position determination of attached particles on cantilever based mass sensors.

Authors:  S Dohn; W Svendsen; A Boisen; O Hansen
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  A multi-stage image charge detector made from printed circuit boards.

Authors:  Brandon L Barney; R Terik Daly; Daniel E Austin
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 6.  Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J A Loo
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.946

7.  Boundaries of mass resolution in native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip Lössl; Joost Snijder; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Completion Occurs through Error Correction.

Authors:  Corinne A Lutomski; Nicholas A Lyktey; Zhongchao Zhao; Elizabeth E Pierson; Adam Zlotnick; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Charging megadalton poly(ethylene oxide)s by electrospray ionization. A charge detection mass spectrometry study.

Authors:  Tristan Doussineau; Michel Kerleroux; Xavier Dagany; Christian Clavier; Marc Barbaire; Jacques Maurelli; Rodolphe Antoine; Philippe Dugourd
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Photoluminescence of charged CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in the gas phase: effects of charge and heating on absorption and emission probabilities.

Authors:  Collin R Howder; Bryan A Long; David M Bell; Kevin H Furakawa; Ryan C Johnson; Zhiyuan Fang; Scott L Anderson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 15.881

View more
  10 in total

1.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry Measurements of Exosomes and other Extracellular Particles Enriched from Bovine Milk.

Authors:  Brooke A Brown; Xuyao Zeng; Aaron R Todd; Lauren F Barnes; Jonathan M A Winstone; Jonathan C Trinidad; Milos V Novotny; Martin F Jarrold; David E Clemmer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A Miniaturized Fourier Transform Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer: Mass Range and Resolution.

Authors:  Joshua T Johnson; Kenneth W Lee; Jay S Bhanot; Scott A McLuckey
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Effects of Individual Ion Energies on Charge Measurements in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry (FT-CDMS).

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Conner C Harper; Haw-Wei Lin; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Ion-Ion Interactions in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel Y Botamanenko; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Enhanced Multiplexing in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry by Decoupling Ion Frequency from Mass to Charge Ratio.

Authors:  Conner C Harper; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Analysis of Keratinocytic Exosomes from Diabetic and Nondiabetic Mice by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Brooke A Brown; Poornachander R Guda; Xuyao Zeng; Adam Anthony; Andrew Couse; Lauren F Barnes; Edie M Sharon; Jonathan C Trinidad; Chandan K Sen; Martin F Jarrold; Subhadip Ghatak; David E Clemmer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 8.008

7.  Dramatic Improvement in Sensitivity with Pulsed Mode Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Aaron R Todd; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Heterogeneity of Glycan Processing on Trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Revealed by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lohra M Miller; Lauren F Barnes; Shannon A Raab; Benjamin E Draper; Tarick J El-Baba; Corinne A Lutomski; Carol V Robinson; David E Clemmer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Isotopic Resolution of Protein Complexes up to 466 kDa Using Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  John P McGee; Rafael D Melani; Ping F Yip; Michael W Senko; Philip D Compton; Jared O Kafader; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Asymmetrizing an icosahedral virus capsid by hierarchical assembly of subunits with designed asymmetry.

Authors:  Zhongchao Zhao; Joseph Che-Yen Wang; Mi Zhang; Nicholas A Lyktey; Martin F Jarrold; Stephen C Jacobson; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 17.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.