Literature DB >> 31677069

Ion-Ion Interactions in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Daniel Y Botamanenko1, Martin F Jarrold2.   

Abstract

Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) is a single-particle technique where the masses of individual ions are determined by simultaneously measuring their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and charge. Ions are usually trapped inside an electrostatic linear ion trap (ELIT) where they oscillate back and forth through a detection cylinder, generating a periodic signal that is analyzed by fast Fourier transforms. The oscillation frequency is related to the ion's m/z, and the magnitude is related to the ion's charge. In early work, multiple ion trapping events were discarded because there was a question about whether ion-ion interactions affected the results. Here, we report trajectory calculations performed to assess the influence of ion-ion interactions when multiple highly charged ions are simultaneously trapped in an ELIT. Ion-ion interactions cause trajectory and energy fluctuations that lead to variations in the oscillation frequencies that in turn degrade the precision and accuracy of the m/z measurements. The peak shapes acquire substantial high and low m/z tails, and the average m/z shifts to a higher value as the number of trapped ions increases. The effects of the ion-ion interactions are proportional to the product of the charges and the square root of the number of trapped ions and depend on the ions' m/z distribution. For the ELIT design examined here, ion-ion interactions limit the m/z resolving power to several hundred for a typical homogeneous ion population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDMS; Charge detection mass spectrometry; ELIT; Electrostatic linear ion trap; Ion-ion interactions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31677069      PMCID: PMC7487123          DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02343-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  16 in total

1.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry with Almost Perfect Charge Accuracy.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Deven L Shinholt; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Real-Time Analysis and Signal Optimization for Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Benjamin E Draper; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Multiplexed Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single Ion Analysis of Large Molecules.

Authors:  Conner C Harper; Andrew G Elliott; Luke M Oltrogge; David F Savage; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Charge detection mass spectrometry: weighing heavier things.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Elizabeth E Pierson; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Charge detection mass spectrometry with resolved charge states.

Authors:  Nathan C Contino; Elizabeth E Pierson; David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Boundaries of mass resolution in native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip Lössl; Joost Snijder; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Charging megadalton poly(ethylene oxide)s by electrospray ionization. A charge detection mass spectrometry study.

Authors:  Tristan Doussineau; Michel Kerleroux; Xavier Dagany; Christian Clavier; Marc Barbaire; Jacques Maurelli; Rodolphe Antoine; Philippe Dugourd
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  The FUNPET-a New Hybrid Ion Funnel-Ion Carpet Atmospheric Pressure Interface for the Simultaneous Transmission of a Broad Mass Range.

Authors:  Benjamin E Draper; Staci N Anthony; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Studying 18 MDa virus assemblies with native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joost Snijder; Rebecca J Rose; David Veesler; John E Johnson; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Mass determination of megadalton-DNA electrospray ions using charge detection mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J C Schultz; C A Hack; W H Benner
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dramatic Improvement in Sensitivity with Pulsed Mode Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Aaron R Todd; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Approaches to Heterogeneity in Native Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Amber D Rolland; James S Prell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 72.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.