Literature DB >> 21290448

Charging megadalton poly(ethylene oxide)s by electrospray ionization. A charge detection mass spectrometry study.

Tristan Doussineau1, Michel Kerleroux, Xavier Dagany, Christian Clavier, Marc Barbaire, Jacques Maurelli, Rodolphe Antoine, Philippe Dugourd.   

Abstract

Ions from compounds of megadalton (MDa) molecular weight were produced in an electrospray ionization source from solutions of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) samples with average molecular weights ranging from 1,000,000 to 7,000,000 Da. Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) has been used to determine the mass of the MDa PEOs. Simultaneous measurement of the charge and velocity of individual ions allows the mass determination of the ion, after calibration of the instrument with independent samples. In addition to the mass spectra, CDMS generates charge-versus-mass plots, which allow investigation of the charging of electrosprayed ions over a broad range of masses. The experimental charging capacity of MDa PEOs is compared with a simple model based on the affinity of alkali cations for oxygen sites and on the electrostatic potential energy of the charged polymer. The charging capacity of PEOs was also investigated as a function of the concentration of and the type of alkali ions.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21290448     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  15 in total

1.  Spontaneous Mass and Charge Losses from Single Multi-Megadalton Ions Studied by Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  David Z Keifer; Andrew W Alexander; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry Measurements of Exosomes and other Extracellular Particles Enriched from Bovine Milk.

Authors:  Brooke A Brown; Xuyao Zeng; Aaron R Todd; Lauren F Barnes; Jonathan M A Winstone; Jonathan C Trinidad; Milos V Novotny; Martin F Jarrold; David E Clemmer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry for Single Ions with an Uncertainty in the Charge Measurement of 0.65 e.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Pierson; Nathan C Contino; David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Effects of Individual Ion Energies on Charge Measurements in Fourier Transform Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry (FT-CDMS).

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Conner C Harper; Haw-Wei Lin; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Charge detection mass spectrometry with resolved charge states.

Authors:  Nathan C Contino; Elizabeth E Pierson; David Z Keifer; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Single Particle Analyzer of Mass: A Charge Detection Mass Spectrometer with a Multi-Detector Electrostatic Ion Trap.

Authors:  Andrew G Elliott; Samuel I Merenbloom; Satrajit Chakrabarty; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Ion-Ion Interactions in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel Y Botamanenko; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Optimized Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap for Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Joanna A Hogan; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Dramatic Improvement in Sensitivity with Pulsed Mode Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Aaron R Todd; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Resolving Adeno-Associated Viral Particle Diversity With Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Pierson; David Z Keifer; Aravind Asokan; Martin F Jarrold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.