Literature DB >> 29946201

A comparison of two different navigated hip replacement techniques on leg length discrepancy.

T N Jennison1, P Craig1, Edward D Davis1.   

Abstract

We hypothesised that a femoral array placed into bone or an external (pinless) reference marker made no difference to leg length discrepancy in patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty. Consecutive patients undergoing navigated total hip arthroplasty. 162 patients. No statistical difference between preoperative leg length discrepancy (p = 0.524). Mean intraoperative change was 3.7 mm and 4.6 mm (p = 0.262). The mean change in leg length measure post operatively was 4.2 mm and 4.1 mm (p = 0.656). No significant difference in leg length discrepancy between a pinless reference markers and a femoral array placed into the bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip arthroplasty; Leg length discrepancy; Navigation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29946201      PMCID: PMC6014568          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  31 in total

1.  Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results.

Authors:  Thomas Ybinger; W Kumpan; H E Hoffart; B Muschalik; W Bullmann; K Zweymüller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Zhinian Wan; William T Long; Michael Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method.

Authors:  Catriona Heaver; Jean-Pierre St Mart; Peter Nightingale; Aabha Sinha; Edward T Davis
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; John R Kean; Andrew H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Leg length and offset measures with a pinless femoral reference array during THA.

Authors:  Tobias Renkawitz; Tibor Schuster; Joachim Grifka; Thomas Kalteis; Ernst Sendtner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris.

Authors:  P A Devane; J G Horne; K Martin; G Coldham; B Krause
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Arnie Bergula; Peter C Chen; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  G Saxler; A Marx; D Vandevelde; U Langlotz; M Tannast; M Wiese; U Michaelis; G Kemper; P A Grützner; R Steffen; M von Knoch; T Holland-Letz; K Bernsmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.