Literature DB >> 17826270

Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results.

Thomas Ybinger1, W Kumpan, H E Hoffart, B Muschalik, W Bullmann, K Zweymüller.   

Abstract

The postoperative position of the acetabular component is key for the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Various aids have been developed to support the surgeon during implant placement. In a prospective study involving 4 centers, the computer-recorded cup alignment of 37 hip systems at the end of navigation-assisted surgery was compared with the cup angles measured on postoperative computerized tomograms. This comparison showed an average difference of 3.5 degrees (SD, 4.4 degrees ) for inclination and 6.5 degrees (SD, 7.3 degrees ) for anteversion angles. The differences in inclination correlated with the thickness of the soft tissue overlying the anterior superior iliac spine (r = 0.44; P = .007), whereas the differences in anteversion showed a correlation with the thickness of the soft tissue overlying the pubic tubercles (r = 0.52; P = .001). In centers experienced in the use of navigational tools, deviations were smaller than in units with little experience in their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17826270     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Intra- and extra-articular planes of reference for use in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jerome Hausselle; Pierre Etienne Moreau; Loic Wessely; Emmanuel de Thomasson; Ayman Assi; Sebastien Parratte; Jerome Essig; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Thomas Ybinger; Wolfgang Kumpan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Intra- and intersurgeon variability in image-free navigation system for THA.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ohashi; Masanori Matsuura; Yusaku Okamoto; Yoshiaki Okajima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Authors:  Chris Bailey; Rehan Gul; Mark Falworth; Steven Zadow; Roger Oakeshott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA.

Authors:  James A Ryan; Amir A Jamali; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.

Authors:  Varun Arora; Richard Hannan; Richard Beaver; Timothy Fletcher; Paul Harvie
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.