Literature DB >> 23934902

Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method.

Catriona Heaver, Jean-Pierre St Mart, Peter Nightingale, Aabha Sinha, Edward T Davis.   

Abstract

Leg length inequality following total hip replacement remains common. In an effort to reduce this occurrence, surgeons undertake pre-operative measurements, templating and use various forms of intraoperative measurements, including computer navigation. This study aims to delineate which measurement technique is most appropriate for measuring leg length inequality from a pelvic radiograph. Three observers took a total of 9600 measurements from 100 pelvic radiographs. Four lines were constructed on each of the radiographs, bisecting the acetabular teardrops, ischial spines, inferior sacroiliac joint and inferior obturator foramen. Measurements were taken from these lines to the most prominent medial point on the lesser trochanter and to the tip of the greater trochanter. The effect of pelvic positioning was also assessed using radiographs of a synthetic pelvis and femur. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability were calculated. Measuring from the inferior aspect of the ischial tuberosities to the most prominent medial point on the lesser trochanter appears to be the best method for measuring LLD however large error margin still exist, even when corrected for magnification errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934902     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of two different navigated hip replacement techniques on leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  T N Jennison; P Craig; Edward D Davis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

2.  Reproducibility of length measurements of the lower limb by using EOS™.

Authors:  A Clavé; D G Maurer; N S Nagra; F Fazilleau; C Lefèvre; E Stindel
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-11-01

3.  Bikini anterior hip replacements in obese patients are not associated with an increased risk of complication.

Authors:  I Nizam; D Dabirrahmani; A Alva; D Choudary
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  The Intraoperative Pelvic Radiograph During Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Reliable to Estimate Leg Length?

Authors:  Henry Tsang; Tony Bouz; Kevin Kwan; Michael French
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-21

5.  Dual head screw hip nailing for trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; George N Panagopoulos; Ioannis P Galanopoulos; Christos Th Vottis; Eirinaios Karamanis; Panayiotis Koulouvaris; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-10-18

6.  Minimizing complications in bikini incision direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: A single surgeon series of 865 cases.

Authors:  Avinash Alva; Ikram Nizam; Sophia Gogos
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  The bikini incision anterior cemented total hip arthroplasty: Assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes - A mid-term review.

Authors:  Ikram Nizam; Avinash Alva; Sophia Gogos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-01-12

8.  Effects of pelvic obliquity and limb position on radiographic leg length discrepancy measurement: a Sawbones model.

Authors:  Mohammed Nazmy Hamad; Isaac Livshetz; Anshum Sood; Michael Patetta; Mark H Gonzalez; Farid A Amirouche
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-07-26

9.  The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length.

Authors:  Maliha Fansur; Nagib A Yurdi; Reinhard Stoewe
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  A low-volume surgeon is an independent risk factor for leg length discrepancy after primary total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yuji Kishimoto; Hiroko Suda; Takahiro Kishi; Toshiaki Takahashi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.075

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.