Literature DB >> 29900674

Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Tracey J F Colella1,2,3, Anam Tahsinul1, Hannah Gatto1, Paul Oh1,4, Martin G Myers4,5.   

Abstract

In SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), use of the Omron 907XL blood pressure (BP) monitor set at 5 minutes of antecedent rest to record BP produced an automated office BP value 7/6 mm Hg lower than awake ambulatory BP at 27 months. The authors studied the impact on automated office BP of setting the Omron 907XL to 0 minutes instead of 5 minutes of rest in patients with readings in the lower normal BP range, similar to on-treatment BP in the SPRINT intensive therapy group. Patients (n = 100) in cardiac rehabilitation were randomized to three BP readings at 1-minute intervals using an Omron 907XL BP device set for 5 or 0 minutes of antecedent rest. Mean (±standard deviation) automated office BP (mm Hg) after 5 minutes of rest (120.2 ± 14.6/66.9 ± 8.6 mm Hg) was lower (P < .001/P < .01) than without rest (124.2 ± 16.4/67.9 ± 9.1 mm Hg). When target BP is in the lower normal range, automated office BP recorded without antecedent rest using an Omron 907XL device should be higher and closer to the awake ambulatory BP, compared with readings taken after 5 minutes of rest. ©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated blood pressure measurement; systolic hypertension; target blood pressure

Year:  2018        PMID: 29900674      PMCID: PMC8030766          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Miguel Valdivieso; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 3.  Unattended Blood Pressure Measurements in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Implications for Entry and Achieved Blood Pressure Values Compared With Other Trials.

Authors:  Sverre E Kjeldsen; Per Lund-Johansen; Peter M Nilsson; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Clinic-Based Hypertension Management on Ambulatory Blood Pressure: Results From the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Ambulatory Blood Pressure Study.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; Nicholas M Pajewski; Jeffrey T Bates; Natalie A Bello; William C Cushman; Jamie P Dwyer; Lawrence J Fine; David C Goff; William E Haley; Marie Krousel-Wood; Andrew McWilliams; Dena E Rifkin; Yelena Slinin; Addison Taylor; Raymond Townsend; Barry Wall; Jackson T Wright; Mahboob Rahman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redón; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Alexander A Leung; Kara Nerenberg; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Kerry McBrien; Kelly B Zarnke; Kaberi Dasgupta; Lyne Cloutier; Mark Gelfer; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Alain Milot; Peter Bolli; Guy Tremblay; Donna McLean; Sheldon W Tobe; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Ross D Feldman; Peter Selby; Andrew Pipe; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Philip A McFarlane; Paul Oh; Robert A Hegele; Milan Khara; Thomas W Wilson; S Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Norman R C Campbell; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Ally Prebtani; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Robert J Petrella; Swapnil Hiremath; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; Jean C Grégoire; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; Mukul Sharma; Debra Reid; Scott A Lear; Gregory Moullec; Milan Gupta; Laura A Magee; Alexander G Logan; Kevin C Harris; Janis Dionne; Anne Fournier; Geneviève Benoit; Janusz Feber; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal; Doreen M Rabi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Office blood pressure is lower than awake ambulatory blood pressure at lower targets for treatment.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Authors:  Tracey J F Colella; Anam Tahsinul; Hannah Gatto; Paul Oh; Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.

Authors:  Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski; Maciej Siński; Zbigniew Gaciong
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Does automated office blood pressure require a 5-minute rest period when used to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Barry Stults; John Doane; Michael Jason Penrod; Molly B Conroy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Letter to the Editor on "Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets".

Authors:  Raj S Padwal
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Authors:  Tracey J F Colella; Anam Tahsinul; Hannah Gatto; Paul Oh; Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Automated office blood pressure is in agreement with awake and mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at the lower blood pressure range.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.