Literature DB >> 19190490

Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.

Martin G Myers1, Miguel Valdivieso, Alexander Kiss, Sheldon W Tobe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare readings obtained using two automated blood pressure (BP) recording devices, BpTRU and Omron 907, in a clinical setting.
METHODS: Two series of 50 patients attending a hypertension unit for 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring had BP recorded either every 1 or every 2 min using BpTRU and Omron 907 devices with the order of the measurements being randomized.
RESULTS: No significant differences for systolic BP between the mean readings taken using the BpTRU or Omron 907 recorders at either 1 or 2 min were observed. Diastolic BP readings were similar using the 1-min interval setting but were 5.0 mmHg lower for the Omron 907 (P<0.001) when readings were taken at 2-min intervals.
CONCLUSION: BP measurements can be made in the clinical setting using either the BpTRU or Omron 907 automated sphygmomanometers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190490     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32831e314f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  14 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin Dawes; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Blood Pressure Goals in Patients with CKD: A Review of Evidence and Guidelines.

Authors:  Alex R Chang; Meghan Lóser; Rakesh Malhotra; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend; Sandra J Taler
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Does automated office blood pressure require a 5-minute rest period when used to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Barry Stults; John Doane; Michael Jason Penrod; Molly B Conroy
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Professors: the world is not flat.

Authors:  Steven A Yarows
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Kathryn A Carson; Jill A Marsteller; Katherine B Dietz; Gary J Noronha; Yea-Jen Hsu; Sarah J Flynn; Jeanne M Charleston; Greg P Prokopowicz; Edgar R Miller; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Authors:  Tracey J F Colella; Anam Tahsinul; Hannah Gatto; Paul Oh; Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.