Literature DB >> 28942618

Office blood pressure is lower than awake ambulatory blood pressure at lower targets for treatment.

Martin G Myers1,2, Janusz Kaczorowski3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28942618      PMCID： PMC8031269          DOI： 10.1111/jch.13090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN： 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with inclusion criteria for the SPRINT trial.

Authors:  Alejandro de la Sierra; José R Banegas; Juan A Divisón; Manuel Gorostidi; Ernest Vinyoles; Juan J de la Cruz; Julián Segura; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-11-05

2.  SPRINT Blood Pressure: Sprinting Back to Smirk's Basal Blood Pressure?

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Grzegorz Bilo; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

Authors:  Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Finlay A McAllister; Martin G Myers; Donald W McKay; Peter Bolli; Carl Abbott; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Steven Grover; George Honos; Marcel Lebel; Karen Mann; Thomas Wilson; Brian Penner; Guy Tremblay; Sheldon W Tobe; Ross D Feldman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Short report: ambulatory blood pressure in normotensive compared with hypertensive subjects. The Ad-Hoc Working Group.

Authors:  J A Staessen; E T O'Brien; N Atkins; A K Amery
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; George S Stergiou; Roland Asmar; Grzegorz Bilo; Peter de Leeuw; Yutaka Imai; Kazuomi Kario; Empar Lurbe; Athanasios Manolis; Thomas Mengden; Eoin O'Brien; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Thomas Pickering; Josep Redon; Miriam Revera; Luis M Ruilope; Andrew Shennan; Jan A Staessen; Andras Tisler; Bernard Waeber; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redón; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial.

Authors:  O R Benavente; C S Coffey; R Conwit; R G Hart; L A McClure; L A Pearce; P E Pergola; J M Szychowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245
View more
  12 in total

1.  A meta-analysis that helps clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Office blood pressure is lower than awake ambulatory blood pressure at lower targets for treatment.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Office blood pressure measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Roland Asmar; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Response to: Does AOBP require a 5-minute rest period to screen for hypertension?

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Response to the Letter to the Editor on "Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets".

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Tracey J F Colella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Comparison of awake ambulatory blood pressure and automated office blood pressure using linear regression analysis in untreated patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Murray Matangi; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Automated office blood pressure measurements obtained with and without preceding rest are associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Antecedent rest may not be necessary for automated office blood pressure at lower treatment targets.

Authors:  Tracey J F Colella; Anam Tahsinul; Hannah Gatto; Paul Oh; Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Attended vs unattended systolic blood pressure measurement: A randomized comparison in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Matthew Villanueva; Yiqing E Chen; Yan Gong; Eileen M Handberg; Steven M Smith; Carl J Pepine; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Automated office blood pressure is in agreement with awake and mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure at the lower blood pressure range.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.