Literature DB >> 29881649

Performance of Photoscreener in Detection of Refractive Error in All Age Groups and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Children in a Tribal District of Odisha: The Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3.

Lapam Panda1, Umasankar Barik2, Suryasmita Nayak1, Biswajit Barik2, Gyanaranjan Behera2, Ramesh Kekunnaya3, Taraprasad Das1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate effectiveness of Welch Allyn Spot Vision Screener in detecting refractive error in all age groups and amblyopia risk factors in children in a tribal district of India.
METHODS: All participants received dry retinoscopy and photorefraction; children also received cycloplegic retinoscopy. Statistical analysis included Bland-Altman and coefficient of determination (R2).
RESULTS: Photoscreener could not elicit a response in 113 adults and 5 children of 580 recruited participants. In Bland-Altman analysis mean difference of Spot screener spherical equivalent (SSSE) and dry retinoscopy spherical equivalent (DRSE) was 0.32 diopters (D) in adults and 0.18 D in children; this was an overestimation of hyperopia and underestimation of myopia. In Bland-Altman analysis of SSSE and cycloplegic retinoscopy spherical equivalent (CRSE) the mean difference was -0.30 D in children; this was an overestimation of myopia and underestimation of hyperopia. In regression analysis the relationship between SSSE and DRSE was poor in adults (R2 = 0.50) and good in children (R2 = 0.92). Cubic regression model for Spot versus cycloretinoscopy in children was: CRSE = 0.34 + 0.85 SSSE - 0.01 SSSE2 + 0.006 SSSE3. It was 87% accurate. Sensitivity and specificity of Spot in detecting amblyopia risk factors (2013 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus [AAPOS] criteria) was 93.3% and 96.9% respectively. Sensitivity of Spot screener in detection of amblyopia was 72%.
CONCLUSIONS: Photoscreener has 87% accuracy in refraction in children. Its value could be used for subjective correction tests. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Photoscreening could complement traditional retinoscopy to address refractive error in children in a resource-limited facility region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children's vision; photoscreener; refraction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29881649      PMCID: PMC5989763          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.7.3.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  A H Dahlmann-Noor; A J Vivian
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 2.  Photorefraction of eyes: history and future prospects.

Authors:  Howard C Howland
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Preschool vision screening: update on guidelines and techniques.

Authors:  Cynthia L Alley
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Saber Moghaddam; Abbas Kargozar; Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; Marzieh Najjaran; Vahideh Nozari; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  A comparison of the Plusoptix S08 photorefractor to retinoscopy and cycloretinoscopy.

Authors:  Ali Mirzajani; Mohsen Heirani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens.

Authors:  Yilmaz Kiyak Ayse; Uretmen Onder; Kose Suheyla
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 7.  Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern®.

Authors:  David K Wallace; Michael X Repka; Katherine A Lee; Michele Melia; Stephen P Christiansen; Christie L Morse; Derek T Sprunger
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Red reflex examination in neonates, infants, and children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  The impact of corrected and uncorrected refractive error on visual functioning: the Singapore Malay Eye Study.

Authors:  Ecosse L Lamoureux; Seang-Mei Saw; Julian Thumboo; Hwee Lin Wee; Tin Aung; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue; Brian Arthur; Daniel E Neely; Robert W Arnold; David Silbert; James B Ruben
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 1.220

View more
  7 in total

1.  Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study # 4: Accuracy and utility of photorefraction for refractive error correction in tribal Odisha (India) school screening.

Authors:  Sandeep Reddy; Lapam Panda; Anjul Kumar; Suryasmita Nayak; Taraprasad Das
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Clinical Performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after Induction of Cycloplegia in Children.

Authors:  Konuralp Yakar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic photorefraction using Spot photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in preschool children in an Indian eye clinic.

Authors:  Manasvini Sharma; Suma Ganesh; Shailja Tibrewal; Shalinder Sabharwal; Neha Sachdeva; Mohd Adil; Jyotsana Chaudhary; Zeeshan Siddiqui
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 7. Prevalence of refractive error in children in tribal Odisha (India) school screening.

Authors:  Lapam Panda; Suryasmita Nayak; Rohit C Khanna; Taraprasad Das
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  School-based epidemiology study of myopia in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Jiaxing Wang; Ying Li; Zhenyang Zhao; Nan Wei; Xiaoli Qi; Gang Ding; Xue Li; Jing Li; Linlin Song; Ying Zhang; Richard Hyun Yi; Yuxian Ning; Xiaoyu Zeng; Ning Hua; Xuehan Qian
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?

Authors:  Debananda Padhy; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Suryasmita Nayak; Suryasnata Rath; Taraprasad Das
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Agreement and diagnostic accuracy of vision screening in preschool children between vision technicians and spot vision screener.

Authors:  Neha Misra; Rohit C Khanna; Asha Latha Mettla; Srinivas Marmamula; Jill E Keeffe
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.