Literature DB >> 23872813

Preschool vision screening: update on guidelines and techniques.

Cynthia L Alley1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the current preschool vision screening (PVS) guidelines and review some of the newest vision screening techniques. The different vision screening practices and barriers to screening are discussed. RECENT
FINDINGS: Vision screening guidelines, which have been developed in response to the advances in technology and increased understanding of the developing visual system, have been recently updated by some of the major medical organizations that endorse vision screening. With advances in vision screening technology, there is a growing trend for screening at younger ages.
SUMMARY: PVS has been widely endorsed by various medical organizations as an effective way to detect preventable and treatable vision problems of childhood. Although PVS is widely recommended, actual screening rates remain low. There are several real and perceived barriers to screening which often prevents successful screening programs. Current vision screening guidelines take into account the recent advances in technology. With the development of new devices, vision screening can effectively be performed at younger ages.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872813     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283641c56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  8 in total

1.  Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.

Authors:  Anna Budai; András Czigler; Eszter Mikó-Baráth; Vanda A Nemes; Gábor Horváth; Ágota Pusztai; David P Piñero; Gábor Jandó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A computerized resolution visual acuity test in preschool and school age children.

Authors:  Ying-Yan Qin; Zhen-Zhen Liu; Li-Yuan Zhu; Xuan Bao; Fu-Rong Luo; Yi-Zhi Liu; Young Tsau; Ming-Xing Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Performance of Photoscreener in Detection of Refractive Error in All Age Groups and Amblyopia Risk Factors in Children in a Tribal District of Odisha: The Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3.

Authors:  Lapam Panda; Umasankar Barik; Suryasmita Nayak; Biswajit Barik; Gyanaranjan Behera; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Taraprasad Das
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Vision Screening of Younger School Children by School Teachers: A Pilot Study in Udaipur City, Western India.

Authors:  Parveen Rewri; Chandra Kant Nagar; Vijay Gupta
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

5.  Evaluation of a smartphone photoscreening app to detect refractive amblyopia risk factors in children aged 1-6 years.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold; James W O'Neil; Kim L Cooper; David I Silbert; Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-23

6.  Comparison between Plusoptix A09 and gold standard cycloplegic refraction in preschool children and agreement to detect refractive amblyogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Jyothi Thomas; B Rajashekar; Asha Kamath; Parikshit Gogate
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-27

7.  Comparison between refraction measured by Spot Vision Screening™ and subjective clinical refractometry.

Authors:  Daniela Lima de Jesus; Flávio Fernandes Villela; Luis Fernando Orlandin; Fernando Naves Eiji; Daniel Oliveira Dantas; Milton Ruiz Alves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Identifying barriers to referrals in preschool-age ocular screening in Southern India.

Authors:  Meenakshi Ravindran; Neelam Pawar; Ramakrishnan Renagappa; Thulsiraj Ravilla; Ruthika Khadse
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.