Literature DB >> 33765790

Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.

Brittany N Jaekel1, Sarah Weinstein1, Rochelle S Newman1, Matthew J Goupell1.   

Abstract

Cochlear-implant (CI) users experience less success in understanding speech in noisy, real-world listening environments than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Perceptual restoration is one method NH listeners use to repair noise-interrupted speech. Whereas previous work has reported that CI users can use perceptual restoration in certain cases, they failed to do so under listening conditions in which NH listeners can successfully restore. Providing increased opportunities to use top-down linguistic knowledge is one possible method to increase perceptual restoration use in CI users. This work tested perceptual restoration abilities in 18 CI users and varied whether a semantic cue (presented visually) was available prior to the target sentence (presented auditorily). Results showed that whereas access to a semantic cue generally improved performance with interrupted speech, CI users failed to perceptually restore speech regardless of the semantic cue availability. The lack of restoration in this population directly contradicts previous work in this field and raises questions of whether restoration is possible in CI users. One reason for speech-in-noise understanding difficulty in CI users could be that they are unable to use tools like restoration to process noise-interrupted speech effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765790      PMCID: PMC7935498          DOI: 10.1121/10.0003573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

Review 1.  Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

5.  NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.

Authors:  Richard C Gershon; Molly V Wagster; Hugh C Hendrie; Nathan A Fox; Karon F Cook; Cindy J Nowinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Older and younger adult cochlear implant users: speech recognition in quiet and noise, quality of life, and music perception.

Authors:  Douglas P Sladen; Amanda Zappler
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Role of contextual cues on the perception of spectrally reduced interrupted speech.

Authors:  Chhayakanta Patro; Lisa Lucks Mendel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory distraction transmitted by a cochlear implant alters allocation of attentional resources.

Authors:  Mareike Finke; Pascale Sandmann; Bruno Kopp; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age.

Authors:  Jefta D Saija; Elkan G Akyürek; Tjeerd C Andringa; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Sarah Weinstein; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.