Literature DB >> 29857578

Benzamide-4-Sulfonamides Are Effective Human Carbonic Anhydrase I, II, VII, and IX Inhibitors.

Morteza Abdoli1,2, Murat Bozdag3, Andrea Angeli4, Claudiu T Supuran5.   

Abstract

A series of benzamides incorporating 4-sulfamoyl moieties were obtained by reacting 4-sulfamoyl benzoic acid with primary and secondary amines and amino acids. These sulfonamides were investigated as inhibitors of the metalloenzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1). The human (h) isoforms hCA II, VII, and IX were inhibited in the low nanomolar or subnanomolar ranges, whereas hCA I was slightly less sensitive to inhibition (KIs of 5.3⁻334 nM). The β- and γ-class CAs from pathogenic bacteria and fungi, such as Vibrio cholerae and Malassezia globosa, were inhibited in the micromolar range by the sulfonamides reported in the paper. The benzamide-4-sulfonamides are a promising class of highly effective CA inhibitors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benzamide; carbonic anhydrase; human isoform; pathogens; sulfonamide

Year:  2018        PMID: 29857578      PMCID: PMC6027465          DOI: 10.3390/metabo8020037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolites        ISSN: 2218-1989


1. Introduction

Benzamides incorporating 3- or 4-sulfamoyl moieties, such as derivatives A and B (Figure 1) were investigated [1,2] as inhibitors of the zinc metallo-enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] in this study, in the search of agents with intraocular pressure lowering effects [1,2]. The incorporation of a wide range of amino acid (AA) or dipeptide AA moieties in molecules A and B led to enhanced water solubility for topical administration within the eye. These compounds showed remarkable in vitro inhibitory effects, assayed by an esterase method with 4-nitrophenyl acetate as substrate, against isoforms hCA II and IV, involved in aqueous humor production within the eye [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
Figure 1

(A,B) Sulfonamides incorporating benzamide moieties, amino acid (AA) and dipeptide AA moieties [1,2].

The CA inhibitors (CAIs) belonging to the sulfonamide and sulfamate types have been used clinically for several decades as diuretics [13,14], antiglaucoma agents [15], and anti-obesity drugs [16,17]. More recently, a large number of studies showed that CA inhibition has profound antitumor effects by inhibiting hypoxia-inducible isoforms hCA IX and XII, overexpressed in many hypoxic tumors [18,19,20,21,22]. Furthermore, several proof-of-concept studies demonstrated the involvement of some CA isoforms in neuropathic pain [23,24] and arthritis [25,26], with the CAIs of sulfonamide and coumarin [27,28,29,30] types demonstrating significant in vivo effects in animal models of these diseases. Thus, the field of drug design, synthesis, and in vivo investigations of various types of CAIs is highly dynamic, with the action of a large number of interesting new chemotypes on these widespread enzymes being constantly studied [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. As they catalyze the interconversion between carbon dioxide (CO2) and bicarbonate with the formation of a proton, CAs are widespread in organisms all over the phylogenetic tree as seven distinct genetic families: the α-, β-, γ-, δ-, η-, ξ-, and θ-CAs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. CAs participate in crucial physiologic processes connected to pH homeostasis, metabolism, transport of gases and ions, and secretion of electrolytes in virtually all living beings [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Apart from the inhibition of human (h) or other vertebrate CA isoforms, the interest in inhibiting such enzymes present in various pathogenic organisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa, or worms) has presented the possibility of designing anti-infective agents with a novel mechanism of action [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Thus, in this paper, we explored novel CAIs belonging to the sulfonamide class, incorporating benzamide moieties similar to compounds reported earlier, but that were investigated for the inhibition of isoforms involved in important diseases, such as glaucoma (hCA II), neuropathic pain (hCA VII), or tumors (hCA IX), and ubiquitous off target isoform hCA I. Furthermore, we investigated whether this chemotype shows inhibitory effects against β- and γ-class CAs from pathogenic bacteria (Vibrio cholerae) or fungi (Malassezia globosa).

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

The classical coupling of carboxylic acid 1 with amines, in the presence of carbodiimides (EDCI) and hydroxybenzotriazole has been used for synthesis, as reported previously [1,2] (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1

Synthesis of compounds 3a–l.

Compound 1 was condensed with compounds 3a–e that possess primary or secondary amines as well amino acid derivatives 3f–l in the presence of EDCI and 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAT) to obtain their corresponding amides (Scheme 1). By choosing variously substituted amines and amino acids, incorporating both simple aliphatic and heterocyclic scaffolds (for the amine) and aliphatic and aromatic amino acids, the physico-chemical properties and enzyme inhibitory properties of the new compounds could be modulated. For example, the amino acid derivatives 3f, 3g, 3h, 3j, and 3l may form sodium salts leading to water soluble CAIs.

2.2. Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition

Sulfonamides 3a–3l were tested as inhibitors of four hCAs involved in various pathologies, hCA I, II, VII, and IX, as well as three β- and γ-CAs from pathogenic organisms: the β-CAs from the bacterium Vibrio cholerae (VchCAβ) and the fungus Malassezia globosa (MgCA), and the γ-CA from the same pathogenic bacterium, VchCAγ–enzymes recently cloned and characterized by our group as potential anti-infective targets [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] (Table 1).
Table 1

Inhibition data of human carbonic anhydrase (CA) isoforms hCA I, II, VII, IX, and pathogenic bacteria and fungi β- and γ-CAs with compounds 3a–3l in comparison with the standard sulfonamide inhibitor AAZ by a stopped flow carbon dioxide (CO2) hydrase assay [60].

KI (nM) a
CpdhCA IhCA IIhCA VIIhCA IXVchCAβMgCAVchCAγ
3a 3345.326.715.970827669929
3b 8.23.50.426.076803921636
3c 67.61.90.622.97415781383
3d 8.76.20.810.785875880693
3e 29.77.06.218.17493985453
3f 57.84.53.716.0817255004458
3g 8.25.20.619.7862632503
3h 5.63.70.48.0719763891
3i 75.76.10.712.19106946744
3j 85.36.13.721.541287.3271
3k 5.34.00.49.39536695756
3l 5.63.30.519.2663517409
AAZ 250.012.15.725.845174000473

a Mean from three different assay using a stopped flow technique. Errors were in the range of ±5% to 10% of the reported values.

3. Discussion

The following structure-activity relationship (SAR) were determined from the data of Table 1, in which the standard sulfonamide inhibitor acetazolamide (AAZ) was also included for comparison. The slow cytosolic isoform hCAI, involved in some ocular diseases (not glaucoma) [3,4,5,6,7], was inhibited by sulfonamides 3a–l reported here with KIs in the range of 5.3 to 334 nM. The ethyl- (3a) derivative was the weakest inhibitor, whereas 3c, 3f, 3i, and 3j showed medium potency inhibitory action, with a KIs in the range of 57.8 to 85.3. These compounds incorporate propargyl, valyl, aspartyl, and alanyl moieties. The remaining derivatives, 3b, 3d, 3e, 3g, 3h, 3k, and 3l showed very effective hCA I inhibitory properties, with a KIs in the range of 5.3 to 29.7 nM, being CAIs an order of magnitude better compared to acetazolamide (Table 1). Small changes in the scaffold (compare 3a and 3b) led to dramatic changes in the hCA I inhibitory effects, with the propyl derivative 3b being 40.7 times more effective an inhibitor compared with the ethyl derivative 3a. All sulfonamides 3a–l reported here were excellent hCA II inhibitors, with a KIs in the range of 1.9 to 7.0 nM, thus being more effective than AAZ (Table 1). With this highly effective inhibition and small range in the variation of the KIs, the SAR is flat and the only conclusion is that all the explored substitution patterns led to highly effective hCA II inhibitors. This is also the dominant cytosolic isoform, involved in glaucoma, diuresis, respiration, and electrolyte secretion in a multitude of tissues [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], meaning these results are highly significant. The third cytosolic isoform investigated here, hCA VII, predominantly found in the brain and involved in epileptogenesis and neuropathic pain [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], was also effectively inhibited by sulfonamides 3a–l, which showed a KIs in the range of 0.4 to 26.7 nM. Most of these compounds were sub-nanomolar hCA VII inhibitors (e.g., 3b–3d, 3g–3i, 3k, 3l), being more effective by an order of magnitude compared with the standard AAZ, whereas few of them showed the same potency as AAZ (3e, 3f, 3j) and only the ethyl derivative 3a was a less effective inhibitor compared to AAZ, with a KI of 26.7 nM. Overall, the SAR is extremely simple, and except for the ethyl derivative mentioned above, all the substitution patterns from derivatives 3b–3l indicated all compounds are highly effective hCA VII inhibitors. The tumor-associated, hypoxia-inducible isoform hCA IX was effectively inhibited by sulfonamides 3a–l, with a KIs in the range of 8.0 to 26. 0 nMh. AAZ has an inhibition constant of 25.8 nM against this isoform. The most effective inhibitors, 3h and 3k, with a KIs of 8.0–9.3 nM, incorporated amino acyl moieties, but all substitution patterns present in compound 3, of the amine or amino acid type, led to highly effective hCA IX inhibition. Conversely, the β- and γ-CAs from pathogenic organisms investigated here were poorly inhibited by these compounds, which showed activity in the micromolar range, with few exceptions (Table 1). Thus, for VchCAβ, the KIs was in the range of 0.41 to 8.58 µM; for MgCA, in the range of 87.3 nM to 7.67 µM; and for VchCAγ, in the range of 0.27 to 4.45 µM. Notably, 3j compounds, which incorporate the alanyl moiety, showed a good inhibitory effect against the Malassezia enzyme, one of the causative agents of dandruff. Acetazolamide is a highly ineffective MgCA inhibitor, and most other sulfonamides investigated here, although less effective than 3j, showed a better activity compared with the standard sulfonamide CAI. Overall, β- and γ-CAs are less sensitive to inhibition with sulfonamides compared with α-CAs [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemistry

Amines, 4-sulfamoyl-benzoic acid, buffers, solvents, and acetazolamide (AAZ) were commercially available, obtained as highest purity reagents from Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, Milan, Italy. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR, 13C NMR) spectra were recorded using a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d). Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) and the coupling constants (J) are expressed in Hertz (Hz). Splitting patterns were designated as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet; brs, broad singlet; and dd, double of doubles. The assignment of exchangeable protons (OH and NH) was confirmed by the addition of D2O. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck silica gel F-254 plates. Flash chromatography purifications were performed on Merck Silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh ASTM) as the stationary phase and MeOH/DCM were used as eluents.

4.1.1. General Procedure to Synthesize Compounds 3a–l

A solution of 4-carboxybenzene sulfonamide 1 (1.0 eq) in dry dimethylformamide (DMF, 3–5 mL) was treated with primary or secondary amines or amino acids 2a–l (1.2 eq), then followed by addition of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI, 1.5 eq.), 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAT, 1.5 eq), and triethylamine (Et3N, 3 eq). The reaction continued until the consumption of starting materials (TLC monitoring, 3–24 h) and quenched with water. The title compounds were either obtained from filtration of the precipitates formed followed by washing with water (3a–3e, 3h, 3k–l) or extracted from ethyl acetate (EtOAc). In the latter, the combined organic layers were washed with H2O (3 × 20 mL), dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in a vacuum to provide a residue that was triturated from dichloromethane (3f–g, 3i–j).

4.1.2. Characterization of Synthesized Compounds (3a–l)

N-Ethyl-4-Sulfamoylbenzamide (3a): 140 mg white solid, yield 83%; δH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 1.17 (3H, t, J 7.2), 3.33 (2H, m), 7.51 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.93 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.02 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.68 (1H, t, J 7.2 exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) 15.5, 35.1, 126.5, 128.6, 138.5, 147.0, and 165.8; m/z (ESI positive) 229.0 [M + H]+. N-Propyl-4-Sulfamoylbenzamide (3b): 120 mg white solid, yield 80%; δH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 0.93 (3H, t, J 7.2), 1.58 (2H, m), 3.27 (2H, q, J 7.2), 7.50 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.93 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.02 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.66 (1H, t, J 7.2, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) 12.3, 23.2, 42.0, 126.5, 128.7, 138.5, 147.0, 166.0; m/z (ESI positive) 243.1 [M + H]+. N-(Prop-2-Yn-1-Yl)-4-Sulfamoylbenzamide (3c): 120 mg yellow solid, yield 74%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 3.18 (1H, T, J 2.5), 4.12 (2H, dd, J 5.5, 2.5), 7.52 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.94 (2H, d, J 8.8), 8.04 (2H, d, J 8.8), 9.16 (1H, t, J 5.5, exchange with D2O, NH); δc (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 29.5, 73.9, 81.9, 126.5, 128.8, 137.6, 147.3, 165.8; m/z (ESI Positive) 239.0 [M + H]+. Experimental data in agreement with reported data [61]. 4-(Morpholine-4-Carbonyl)Benzenesulfonamide (3d): 10 mg pale yellow solid; 9% yield; δH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 3.65 (8H, m), 7.44 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.63 (2H, d, J 8.0), 7.92 (2H, d, J 8.0); δC (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) 66.9, 66.9, 126.7, 128.5, 139.7, 145.8, 168.8; m/z (ESI positive) 271.1 [M + H]+. 4-(Piperidine-1-Carbonyl)Benzenesulfonamide (3e): 12 mg yellow solid, yield 18%; δH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 1.50 (2H, m), 1.65 (4H, m), 3.25 (2H, m), 3.63 (2H, m), 7.48 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.59 (2H, d, J 8.0), 7.91 (2H, d, J 8.0); δC (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) 26.1, 26.7, 48.8, 126.7, 128.0, 140.7, 145.4, 168.5; m/z (ESI positive) 269.1 [M + H]+. Methyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-dl-Valinate (3f): 12 mg pale yellow solid, yield 10%; δH (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) 0.98 (3H, d, J 6.8), 1.02 (3H, d, J 6.8), 2.23 (1H, m), 3.70 (3H, s), 4.36 (1H, t, J 6.8), 7.53 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.94 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.05 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.83 (1H, d, J 6.8, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) 19.9, 20.0, 30.5, 52.6, 59.6, 126.4, 129.2, 137.7, 147.4, 167.0, 172.9; m/z (ESI positive) 315.0 [M + H]+. Dimethyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-d-Glutamate (3g): 14 mg pale yellow solid, yield 16%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 2.07 (2H, m), 2.16 (2H, m), 3.63 (3H, s), 3.70 (3H, s), 4.53 (1H, m), 7.52 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.94 (2H, d, J 8.8), 8.05 (2H, d, J 8.8), 8.83 (1H, d, J 7.3, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 26.6, 30.8, 52.3, 52.9, 53.0, 126.5, 129.0, 137.4, 147.5, 166.6, 172.9, 173.5; m/z (ESI Positive) 359.1 [M + H]+. Methyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-l-Leucinate (3h): 37 mg white solid, yield 25%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 0.92 (3H, d, J 6.4), 0.97 (3H, d, J 6.4), 1.63 (1H, m), 1.70–1.86 (2H, m), 3.69 (3H, s), 4.56 (1H, m), 7.52 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.95 (2H, d, J 8.3), 8.06 (2H, d, J 8.3), 8.94 (1H, d, J 6.4, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 22.1, 23.7, 25.3, 40.2, 51.9, 52.8, 126.5, 129.0, 137.5, 147.4, 166.5, 173.8; m/z (ESI Positive) 329.01 [M + H]+. Dimethyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-d-Aspartate (3i): 35 mg yellow solid, yield 50%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 2.86–3.04 (2H, m), 3.67 (3H, s), 3.70 (3H, s), 4.89 (1H, m), 7.52 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.96 (2H, d, J 8.7), 8.03 (2H, d, J 8.7), 9.13 (1H, d, J 7.6, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 36.2, 50.2, 52.6, 53.2, 126.6, 129.0, 137.2, 147.6, 166.1, 171.3, 171.9; m/z (ESI Positive) 345.0 [M + H]+. Methyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-dl-Alaninate (3j): 14 mg white solid, yield 13%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 1.46 (3H, d, J 7.3), 3,69 (3H, s), 4.54 (1H, m), 7.51 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.96 (2H, d, J 8.4), 8.06 (2H, d, J 8.4), 9.01 (1H, d, J 7.3, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 17.6, 49.3, 52.8, 126.5, 129.0, 137.4, 147.4, 166.2, 173.8; m/z (ESI Positive) 287.0 [M + H]+. Ethyl 4-(4-Sulfamoylbenzamido)Butanoate (3k): 80 mg white solid, yield 58%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 1.20 (3H, t, J 7.2), 1.83 (2H, pent, J 6.8), 2.39 (2H, t, J 6.8), 3.31 (2H, m), 4.09 (2H, q, J 7.2), 7.47 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.91 (2H, d, J 8.0), 8.01 (2H, d, J 8.0), 8.66 (1H, t, J 6.8, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 15.0, 25.3, 31.9, 39.6, 60.6, 126.5, 128.7, 138.3, 147.1, 166.1, 173.5; m/z (ESI Positive) 315.0 [M + H]+. Methyl (4-Sulfamoylbenzoyl)-l-Phenylalaninate (3l): 130 mg white solid, yield 72%; δH (400 Mhz, DMSO-d6) 3.10–3.25 (2H, m), 3.69 (3H, s), 4.70–4.76 (1H, m), 7.24 (1H, m), 7.32 (4H, m), 7.52 (2H, s, exchange with D2O, SO2NH2), 7.93 (2H, d, J 8.4), 7.98 (2H, d, J 8.4), 9.08 (1H, d, J 7.9, exchange with D2O, NH); δC (100 Mhz, DMSO-d) 37.1, 52.9, 55.2, 126.5, 127.4, 128.9, 129.2, 130.0, 137.4, 138.4, 147.4, 166.3, 172.8; m/z (ESI Positive) 363.0 [M + H]+.

4.2. CA Enzyme Inhibition Assay

An Sx.18Mv-R Applied Photophysics (Oxford, U.K.) stopped-flow instrument was used to assay he catalytic activity of various CA isozymes for CO2 hydration reaction [60]. Phenol red, at a concentration of 0.2 mM, was used as an indicator, working at the absorbance maximum of 557 nm, with 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.5, for α-CAs) or TRIS (pH 8.3, for β- and γ-CAs) as buffers, 0.1 M sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) (for maintaining constant ionic strength), following the CA-catalyzed CO2 hydration reaction for a period of 10 s at 25 °C. The CO2 concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 17 mM for the determination of the kinetic parameters and inhibition constants. For each inhibitor, at least six traces of the initial 5–10% of the reaction were used for determining the initial velocity. The uncatalyzed rates were determined in the same manner and subtracted from the total observed rates. Stock solutions of inhibitors (10 mM) were prepared in distilled-deionized water. Dilutions up to 1 nM were performed thereafter with the assay buffer. Enzyme and inhibitor solutions were pre-incubated together for 15 min (standard assay at room temperature) prior to assay, to allow for the formation of the enzyme–inhibitor complex. The inhibition constants were obtained by non-linear least-squares methods using PRISM 3 and the Cheng-Prusoff equation, as reported earlier [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. All CAs were recombinant proteins produced as reported earlier by our groups [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].

5. Conclusions

We report a series of benzamides incorporating 4-sulfamoyl moieties, which were obtained by reacting 4-sulfamoyl benzoic acid with primary and secondary amines and amino acids. These sulfonamides were investigated as inhibitors of several enzymes, including the human (h) isoforms hCA II, VII, and IX, involved in severe pathologies, such as glaucoma, epilepsy, neuropathic pain and cancer; and β- and γ-class CAs from pathogenic bacteria and fungi. hCA II, VII, and IX were inhibited in the low nanomolar or subnanomolar ranges by all investigated sulfonamides, whereas hCA I was slightly less sensitive to inhibition (KIs of 5.3–334 nM). The Vibrio cholerae and Malassezia globosa CAs were generally inhibited in the micromolar range by the sulfonamides reported in the paper. The benzamide-4-sulfonamides constitute a promising class of highly effective CA inhibitors. Further investigations will focus on extending the series of sulfanilamide possessing aliphatic tails with carbamide linkers, such as cyclic and aliphatic and aromatic, to investigate and obtain isoform selective inhibitors for their profiling and possible in vivo applications.
  74 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition of the archaeal beta-class (Cab) and gamma-class (Cam) carbonic anhydrases.

Authors:  Sabrina A Zimmerman; James G Ferry; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  An overview of the alpha-, beta- and gamma-carbonic anhydrases from Bacteria: can bacterial carbonic anhydrases shed new light on evolution of bacteria?

Authors:  Clemente Capasso; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.051

3.  Structure-Activity Relationship for Sulfonamide Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori α-Carbonic Anhydrase.

Authors:  Joyanta K Modak; Yu C Liu; Claudiu T Supuran; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Synthesis of N'-phenyl-N-hydroxyureas and investigation of their inhibitory activities on human carbonic anhydrases.

Authors:  Murat Bozdag; Fabrizio Carta; Andrea Angeli; Sameh M Osman; Fatmah A S Alasmary; Zeid AlOthman; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.275

5.  Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: novel sulfonamides incorporating 1,3,5-triazine moieties as inhibitors of the cytosolic and tumour-associated carbonic anhydrase isozymes I, II and IX.

Authors:  Vladimir Garaj; Luca Puccetti; Giuseppe Fasolis; Jean-Yves Winum; Jean-Louis Montero; Andrea Scozzafava; Daniela Vullo; Alessio Innocenti; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  A substituted sulfonamide and its Co (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) complexes as potential antifungal agents.

Authors:  Jorge R A Diaz; Martín Fernández Baldo; Gustavo Echeverría; Héctor Baldoni; Daniela Vullo; Delia B Soria; Claudiu T Supuran; Gerardo E Camí
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.051

7.  Overexpression of the transmembrane carbonic anhydrase isoforms IX and XII in the inflamed synovium.

Authors:  Francesca Margheri; Mariangela Ceruso; Fabrizio Carta; Anna Laurenzana; Laura Maggi; Simone Lazzeri; Gabriele Simonini; Francesco Annunziato; Mario Del Rosso; Claudiu T Supuran; Rolando Cimaz
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.051

8.  Sulfocoumarins (1,2-benzoxathiine-2,2-dioxides): a class of potent and isoform-selective inhibitors of tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases.

Authors:  Kaspars Tars; Daniela Vullo; Andris Kazaks; Janis Leitans; Alons Lends; Aiga Grandane; Raivis Zalubovskis; Andrea Scozzafava; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors?

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.051

10.  Inhibition of the α-carbonic anhydrase from Vibrio cholerae with amides and sulfonamides incorporating imidazole moieties.

Authors:  Daniela De Vita; Andrea Angeli; Fabiana Pandolfi; Martina Bortolami; Roberta Costi; Roberto Di Santo; Elisabetta Suffredini; Mariangela Ceruso; Sonia Del Prete; Clemente Capasso; Luigi Scipione; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.051

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Non-Viral Delivery System and Targeted Bone Disease Therapy.

Authors:  Abdul Qadir; Yongguang Gao; Patil Suryaji; Ye Tian; Xiao Lin; Kai Dang; Shanfeng Jiang; Yu Li; Zhiping Miao; Airong Qian
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Synthesis and pharmacological effects of novel benzenesulfonamides carrying benzamide moiety as carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  Mehtap TuĞrak; Halise İnci GÜl; Barış Anil; İlhami GÜlÇİn
Journal:  Turk J Chem       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 1.239

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.