| Literature DB >> 28766952 |
Alessio Nocentini1,2, Daniela Vullo3, Sonia Del Prete1,4, Sameh M Osman5, Fatmah A S Alasmary5, Zeid AlOthman5, Clemente Capasso4, Fabrizio Carta1, Paola Gratteri2, Claudiu T Supuran1.
Abstract
A series of monothiocarbamates (MTCs) was investigated for the inhibition of the β-class carbonic anhydrase (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) from the fungal parasite Malassezia globosa, MgCA. These MTCs incorporate various scaffolds, among which aliphatic amine with 1-4 carbons atom in their molecule, morpholine, piperazine, as well as phenethylamine and benzylamine derivatives. All the reported MTCs displayed a better efficacy in inhibiting MgCA compared to the clinically used sulphonamide drug acetazolamide (KI of 74 μM), with KIs spanning between 1.85 and 18.9 μM. The homology model of the enzyme previously reported by us was used to rationalize the results by docking some of these MTCs within the fungal CA active site. This study might be useful to enrich the knowledge of the MgCA inhibition profile, eliciting novel ideas pertaining the design of modulators with potential efficacy in combatting dandruff or other fungal infections.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase; Malassezia globosa; inhibitor; monothiocarbamate; β-CA-class enzyme
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28766952 PMCID: PMC6010091 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1355307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
hCA I, II and MgCA inhibition data with MTCs 1−15, trithiocarbonate 16 and xanthate 17 by a stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay.
| KIa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | R | R1 | hCA I (nM) | hCA II(nM) | MgCA (µM) |
| H | 891 | 26.7 | 14.1 | ||
| H | >2000 | 43.7 | 18.9 | ||
| H | >2000 | 35.0 | 7.81 | ||
| >2000 | 46.7 | 1.85 | |||
| 909 | >2000 | 7.52 | |||
| 681 | 43.0 | 8.61 | |||
| Et | 700 | >2000 | 5.26 | ||
| Me | 827 | 44.5 | 9.16 | ||
| Me | Bn | >2000 | >2000 | 7.61 | |
| –(CH2CH2)–O–(CH2CH2)– | 569 | >2000 | 7.65 | ||
| –(CH2CH2)–NH–(CH2CH2)– | 876 | 22.4 | 7.41 | ||
| –(CH2CH2)–N(4–F–C6H4)–(CH2CH2)– | 895 | 46.8 | 8.33 | ||
| –(CH2CH2)–N(4–CF3–C6H4)–(CH2CH2)– | >2000 | 43.6 | 4.22 | ||
| –(CH2CH2)–N(3–Cl–C6H4)–(CH2CH2)– | 686 | >2000 | 15.9 | ||
| –(CH2CH2)–N(CH2CONHC6H11)–(CH2CH2)– | 949 | 45.9 | 6.13 | ||
| Bn | – | 4.1 | 0.70 | 8.12 | |
| – | 64.1 | 5.4 | 16.2 | ||
| AAZ | 250 | 12 | 74 | ||
Mean from three different assays, by a stopped flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values); bhCA I and hCA II data from Ref.14f.
Figure 1.(a) ESP atomic charges of 2 derived from a B3LYP/6–31 G*+. Red colour represents negative values of the electrostatic potential (b) Schematic representation of the binding mode of MTCs into the MgCA active site.
Figure 2.Docked orientations of compounds 2 and 9 (a); 8 (b) and 10 (c) within MgCA active site. Monomer A and B are coloured blue and green, respectively.