| Literature DB >> 28569564 |
Daniela De Vita1, Andrea Angeli2, Fabiana Pandolfi1, Martina Bortolami1, Roberta Costi1, Roberto Di Santo1, Elisabetta Suffredini3, Mariangela Ceruso4, Sonia Del Prete2,5, Clemente Capasso5, Luigi Scipione1, Claudiu T Supuran2,4.
Abstract
We discovered novel and selective sulfonamides/amides acting as inhibitors of the α-carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) from the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae (VchCA). This Gram-negative bacterium is the causative agent of cholera and colonises the upper small intestine where sodium bicarbonate is present at a high concentration. The secondary sulfonamides and amides investigated here were potent, low nanomolar VchCA inhibitors whereas their inhibition of the human cytosolic isoforms CA I and II was in the micromolar range or higher. The molecules represent an interesting lead for antibacterial agents with a possibly new mechanism of action, although their CA inhibition mechanism is unknown for the moment.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase; Vibrio cholerae; antibacterials; inhibitor; sulfonamide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28569564 PMCID: PMC6445327 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2017.1327522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Scheme 1.General synthesis of 1–9. Reagents and conditions: (a): TEA, dry CH2Cl2, 12–48 h, RT.
Scheme 2.Synthesis of 10. Reagents and conditions: (a): TEA, dry CH2Cl2, 16 h, RT.
Inhibition activity of compounds 1–10 and AAZ against Vibrio cholerae α-carbonic anhydrase, obtained as described in the supplementary information.
| Compound | hCA I | hCA II | VchCA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 387.36 | >10,000 | 10.9 | ||
| 1697.42 | >10,000 | 8.5 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 6.4 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 6.2 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 39.2 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 9.1 | ||
| 2549.16 | >10,000 | 10.4 | ||
| 1730.79 | >10,000 | 11.0 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 5.4 | ||
| >50,000 | >50,000 | 7.8 | ||
| 250 | 12.1 | 5.0 | ||
Data represent the mean of 3 different assays; the mean errors are ±5–10% of the reported values.