Literature DB >> 29850764

Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.

Noel T Brewer1,2, Humberto Parada3,2,4, Marissa G Hall2, Marcella H Boynton1, Seth M Noar2,5, Kurt M Ribisl1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our randomized trial found that pictorial cigarette pack warnings elicited more quit attempts than text-only warnings.
PURPOSE: In the current study, we sought to identify psychological mechanisms that explain why pictorial cigarette pack warnings change behavior.
METHODS: In 2014 and 2015, we recruited 2,149 adult smokers in NC and CA, USA. We randomly assigned smokers to receive on their cigarette packs for 4 weeks either a text-only warning (one of the USA's current warnings on the side of cigarette packs) or a pictorial warning (one of the USA's proposed text warnings with pictures on the top half of the front and back of cigarette packs).
RESULTS: Pictorial warnings increased attention to, reactions to, and social interactions about cigarette pack warnings (all p < .05). However, pictorial warnings changed almost no belief or attitude measures. Mediators of the impact of pictorial warnings included increased attention, negative affect, social interactions, thinking about the warning and harms of smoking, and intentions to quit (all p < .05). Analyses also found that pictorial warnings led to greater avoidance of the warnings, which was associated with more quit attempts (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Pictorial warnings increased quit attempts by eliciting aversive reactions and by keeping the message vividly in smokers' minds. Contrary to predictions from several theories of health behavior, the warnings exerted little of their influence through changes in beliefs and attitudes and none of their influence through changes in risk perception. We propose the Tobacco Warnings Model based on these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02247908; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02247908. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cigarettes; mediation analysis; pictorial warnings; quit attempts; randomized controlled trial; smoking

Year:  2019        PMID: 29850764      PMCID: PMC6265120          DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  34 in total

Review 1.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project.

Authors:  G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; S E Marcus; R P Moser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Romer; Paul Slovic; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Leisha Wharfield; C K Mertz; Stephanie M Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Seth M Noar; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Laura E Bach; Sean Hanley; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Testing warning messages on smokers' cigarette packages: a standardised protocol.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Joseph G L Lee; Kathryn Peebles; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Laura E Bach; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

7.  Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Humberto Parada; Trent O Johnson; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Marissa G Hall; Diane B Francis; Kurt M Ribisl; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Attitudes Toward FDA Regulation of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Sarah D Kowitt; Adam O Goldstein; Allison M Schmidt; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-10-01

10.  Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Abigail T Evans; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Lydia F Emery; Kaitlin M Sheerin; Daniel Romer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  48 in total

1.  Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Daniel Owusu; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Do graphic health warning labels on cigarette packages deter purchases at point-of-sale? An experiment with adult smokers.

Authors:  William G Shadel; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; Michael Dunbar; Deborah Scharf; Kasey G Creswell
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  Independent or synergistic? Effects of varying size and using pictorial images in tobacco health warning labels.

Authors:  Chris Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Michael C Dorf; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Jennifer R Mendel; Seth M Noar; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Some Risk Appraisals But Not Risk Beliefs: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Joshua O Barker; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2020-02-03

6.  How should sugar-sweetened beverage health warnings be designed? A randomized experiment.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Marissa G Hall; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig; Seth M Noar; Nisha C Gottfredson; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-17

8.  Ethical Considerations for Food and Beverage Warnings.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Marissa G Hall; Jason P Block; Sara N Bleich; Eric B Rimm; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Anne Barnhill
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-11

9.  Development and Pretesting of Risk-Based Mobile Multimedia Message Content for Young Adult Hookah Use.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Isaac Lipkus; Kenneth P Tercyak; George Luta; Kathryn Rehberg; Lilianna Phan; Lorien C Abroms; Darren Mays
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2019-12

10.  Effects of strengthening alcohol labels on attention, message processing, and perceived effectiveness: A quasi-experimental study in Yukon, Canada.

Authors:  Erin Hobin; Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw; Ashini Weerasinghe; Kate Vallance; David Hammond; Thomas K Greenfield; Jonathan McGavock; Catherine Paradis; Tim Stockwell
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.