Marissa G Hall1,2,3, Paschal Sheeran1,3,4, Seth M Noar1,3,5, Kurt M Ribisl1,2,3, Laura E Bach1,2,3, Noel T Brewer6,7,8. 1. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 4. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 5. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 6. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. ntb@unc.edu. 7. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. ntb@unc.edu. 8. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. ntb@unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health warnings may be less effective if they elicit reactance, a motivation to resist a threat to freedom, yet we lack a standard measure of reactance. PURPOSE: We sought to validate a new health warning reactance scale in the context of pictorial cigarette pack warnings. METHODS:A national sample of adults (n = 1413) responded to reactance survey questions while viewing randomly assigned pictorial or text warnings on images of cigarette packs. A separate longitudinal sample of adult smokers received the warnings on their own cigarette packs (n = 46). RESULTS: Factor analyses identified a reliable and valid 27-item Reactance to Health Warnings Scale. In our experimental study, smokers rated pictorial warnings as being able to motivate quitting more than text warnings. However, five reactance scale factors weakened the warnings' impact (anger, exaggeration, government, manipulation, and personal attack; all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Reactance to Health Warnings Scale had good psychometric properties. Reactance weakened the impact of pictorial warnings on smokers' evaluation of the warning's ability to motivate quitting.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Health warnings may be less effective if they elicit reactance, a motivation to resist a threat to freedom, yet we lack a standard measure of reactance. PURPOSE: We sought to validate a new health warning reactance scale in the context of pictorial cigarette pack warnings. METHODS: A national sample of adults (n = 1413) responded to reactance survey questions while viewing randomly assigned pictorial or text warnings on images of cigarette packs. A separate longitudinal sample of adult smokers received the warnings on their own cigarette packs (n = 46). RESULTS: Factor analyses identified a reliable and valid 27-item Reactance to Health Warnings Scale. In our experimental study, smokers rated pictorial warnings as being able to motivate quitting more than text warnings. However, five reactance scale factors weakened the warnings' impact (anger, exaggeration, government, manipulation, and personal attack; all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Reactance to Health Warnings Scale had good psychometric properties. Reactance weakened the impact of pictorial warnings on smokers' evaluation of the warning's ability to motivate quitting.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health communication; Pictorial warnings; Reactance; Scale development; Tobacco control
Authors: Jane M Young; Ingrid Stacey; Timothy A Dobbins; Sally Dunlop; Anita L Dessaix; David C Currow Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Jessica K Pepper; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Linda D Cameron; Melissa B Gilkey; Noel T Brewer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Geoffrey T Fong; Pete Driezen; Ron Borland; Anne C K Quah; Buppha Sirirassamee; Stephen Hamann; Maizurah Omar Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: William G Shadel; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; Michael Dunbar; Deborah Scharf; Kasey G Creswell Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kathryn Peebles; Marissa G Hall; Jessica K Pepper; M Justin Byron; Seth M Noar; Noel T Brewer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: James F Thrasher; Noel T Brewer; Jeff Niederdeppe; Ellen Peters; Andrew A Strasser; Rachel Grana; Annette R Kaufman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244