Literature DB >> 17454702

The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.

Ellen Peters1, Daniel Romer, Paul Slovic, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Leisha Wharfield, C K Mertz, Stephanie M Carpenter.   

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is a major source of mortality and medical costs in the United States. More graphic and salient warning labels on cigarette packs as used in Canada may help to reduce smoking initiation and increase quit attempts. However, the labels also may lead to defensive reactions among smokers. In an experimental setting, smokers and nonsmokers were exposed to Canadian or U.S. warning labels. Compared with current U.S. labels, Canadian labels produced more negative affective reactions to smoking cues and to the smoker image among both smokers and nonsmokers without signs of defensive reactions from smokers. A majority of both smokers and nonsmokers endorsed the use of Canadian labels in the United States. Canadian-style warnings should be adopted in the United States as part of the country's overall tobacco control strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17454702     DOI: 10.1080/14622200701239639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  54 in total

1.  Recall of tobacco pack health warnings by the population in Ukraine and its association with the perceived tobacco health hazard.

Authors:  Tatiana I Andreeva; Konstantin S Krasovsky
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Ohio Appalachian residents' views on smoke-free laws and cigarette warning labels.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mary E Wewers; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth G Klein; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.

Authors:  Susan E Rivers; Valerie F Reyna; Britain Mills
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2008-03

4.  Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels.

Authors:  Lydia F Emery; Daniel Romer; Kaitlin M Sheerin; Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Humberto Parada; Marissa G Hall; Marcella H Boynton; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-01

6.  Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Daniel Owusu; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years.

Authors:  R Borland; N Wilson; G T Fong; D Hammond; K M Cummings; H-H Yong; W Hosking; G Hastings; J Thrasher; A McNeill
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  FDA cigarette warning labels lower craving and elicit frontoinsular activation in adolescent smokers.

Authors:  Kathy T Do; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The Effect of Graphic Warnings on Sugary-Drink Purchasing.

Authors:  Grant E Donnelly; Laura Y Zatz; Dan Svirsky; Leslie K John
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

10.  Women's perspectives on smoking and pregnancy and graphic warning labels.

Authors:  Denise M Levis; Brenda Stone-Wiggins; Michelle O'Hegarty; Van T Tong; Kara N D Polen; Cynthia H Cassell; Mary Council
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.