N D Weinstein1, S E Marcus, R P Moser. 1. Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, Cook Office Building, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. neilw@aesop.rutgers.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Past studies have produced ambiguous or inconsistent results when testing whether smokers actually underestimate their own risks of experiencing tobacco related illness. Whereas smokers claim that they are less at risk than the average smoker on self administered questionnaires, this unrealistic optimism has not been found in telephone or face-to-face interviews. We avoided the measurement problems of past studies and examined responses to a number of new questions to assess different aspects of smokers' perceptions. METHODOLOGY: A US national telephone survey (n = 6369; 1245 current smokers) posed a variety of questions designed to examine beliefs about the risks of smoking. For key questions, separate samples of smokers were asked either about their own risk or about the risk of the average smoker. RESULTS: Smokers underestimated their relative risk compared to non-smokers and, contrary to previous interview surveys, believed they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker. Furthermore, their perceived risk of lung cancer and of cancer in general barely increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and their estimates of their risk of cancer are actually slightly lower than their estimates of their risk of lung cancer. Substantial proportions of smokers and former smokers agree with several myths, more than half agreeing that exercise undoes most smoking effects. CONCLUSION: Smokers underestimate their risk of lung cancer both relative to other smokers and to non-smokers and demonstrate other misunderstandings of smoking risks. Smoking cannot be interpreted as a choice made in the presence of full information about the potential harm.
OBJECTIVE: Past studies have produced ambiguous or inconsistent results when testing whether smokers actually underestimate their own risks of experiencing tobacco related illness. Whereas smokers claim that they are less at risk than the average smoker on self administered questionnaires, this unrealistic optimism has not been found in telephone or face-to-face interviews. We avoided the measurement problems of past studies and examined responses to a number of new questions to assess different aspects of smokers' perceptions. METHODOLOGY: A US national telephone survey (n = 6369; 1245 current smokers) posed a variety of questions designed to examine beliefs about the risks of smoking. For key questions, separate samples of smokers were asked either about their own risk or about the risk of the average smoker. RESULTS: Smokers underestimated their relative risk compared to non-smokers and, contrary to previous interview surveys, believed they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker. Furthermore, their perceived risk of lung cancer and of cancer in general barely increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and their estimates of their risk of cancer are actually slightly lower than their estimates of their risk of lung cancer. Substantial proportions of smokers and former smokers agree with several myths, more than half agreeing that exercise undoes most smoking effects. CONCLUSION: Smokers underestimate their risk of lung cancer both relative to other smokers and to non-smokers and demonstrate other misunderstandings of smoking risks. Smoking cannot be interpreted as a choice made in the presence of full information about the potential harm.
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Elyse R Park; Joanna M Streck; Ilana F Gareen; Jamie S Ostroff; Kelly A Hyland; Nancy A Rigotti; Hannah Pajolek; Mark Nichter Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Annette R Kaufman; Lila J Finney Rutten; Mark Parascandola; Kelly D Blake; Erik M Augustson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anna Lucas-Wright; Mohsen Bazargan; Loretta Jones; Jaydutt V Vadgama; Roberto Vargas; Marianna Sarkissyan; James Smith; Hamed Yazdanshenas; Annette E Maxwell Journal: J Community Health Date: 2014-02
Authors: Geoffrey T Fong; Tara Elton-Marshall; Pete Driezen; Annette R Kaufman; K Michael Cummings; Kelvin Choi; Jonathan Kwan; Amber Koblitz; Andrew Hyland; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Charles Carusi; Mary E Thompson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Abigail C Halperin; L Anne Thompson; Jennifer C Hymer; Amber K Peterson; Beti Thompson Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792