Noel T Brewer1, Marissa G Hall1, Seth M Noar2, Humberto Parada3, Al Stein-Seroussi4, Laura E Bach5, Sean Hanley4, Kurt M Ribisl1. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill3School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 4. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Chapel Hill Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs draw attention and increase quit intentions, but their effect on smoking behavior remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adding pictorial warnings to the front and back of cigarette packs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 4-week between-participant randomized clinical trial was carried out in California and North Carolina. We recruited a convenience sample of adult cigarette smokers from the general population beginning September 2014 through August 2015. Of 2149 smokers who enrolled, 88% completed the trial. No participants withdrew owing to adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned participants to receive on their cigarette packs for 4 weeks either text-only warnings (one of the Surgeon General's warnings currently in use in the United States on the side of the cigarette packs) or pictorial warnings (one of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act's required text warnings and pictures that showed harms of smoking on the top half of the front and back of the cigarette packs). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary trial outcome was attempting to quit smoking during the study. We hypothesized that smokers randomized to receive pictorial warnings would be more likely to report a quit attempt during the study than smokers randomized to receive a text-only Surgeon General's warning. RESULTS: Of the 2149 participants who began the trial (1039 men, 1060 women, and 34 transgender people; mean [SD] age, 39.7 [13.4] years for text-only warning, 39.8 [13.7] for pictorial warnings), 1901 completed it. In intent-to-treat analyses (n = 2149), smokers whose packs had pictorial warnings were more likely than those whose packs had text-only warnings to attempt to quit smoking during the 4-week trial (40% vs 34%; odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54). The findings did not differ across any demographic groups. Having quit smoking for at least the 7 days prior to the end of the trial was more common among smokers who received pictorial than those who received text-only warnings (5.7% vs 3.8%; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.29). Pictorial warnings also increased forgoing a cigarette, intentions to quit smoking, negative emotional reactions, thinking about the harms of smoking, and conversations about quitting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pictorial warnings effectively increased intentions to quit, forgoing cigarettes, quit attempts, and successfully quitting smoking over 4 weeks. Our trial findings suggest that implementing pictorial warnings on cigarette packs in the United States would discourage smoking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02247908.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs draw attention and increase quit intentions, but their effect on smoking behavior remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adding pictorial warnings to the front and back of cigarette packs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 4-week between-participant randomized clinical trial was carried out in California and North Carolina. We recruited a convenience sample of adult cigarette smokers from the general population beginning September 2014 through August 2015. Of 2149 smokers who enrolled, 88% completed the trial. No participants withdrew owing to adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned participants to receive on their cigarette packs for 4 weeks either text-only warnings (one of the Surgeon General's warnings currently in use in the United States on the side of the cigarette packs) or pictorial warnings (one of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act's required text warnings and pictures that showed harms of smoking on the top half of the front and back of the cigarette packs). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary trial outcome was attempting to quit smoking during the study. We hypothesized that smokers randomized to receive pictorial warnings would be more likely to report a quit attempt during the study than smokers randomized to receive a text-only Surgeon General's warning. RESULTS: Of the 2149 participants who began the trial (1039 men, 1060 women, and 34 transgender people; mean [SD] age, 39.7 [13.4] years for text-only warning, 39.8 [13.7] for pictorial warnings), 1901 completed it. In intent-to-treat analyses (n = 2149), smokers whose packs had pictorial warnings were more likely than those whose packs had text-only warnings to attempt to quit smoking during the 4-week trial (40% vs 34%; odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54). The findings did not differ across any demographic groups. Having quit smoking for at least the 7 days prior to the end of the trial was more common among smokers who received pictorial than those who received text-only warnings (5.7% vs 3.8%; OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.29). Pictorial warnings also increased forgoing a cigarette, intentions to quit smoking, negative emotional reactions, thinking about the harms of smoking, and conversations about quitting. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pictorial warnings effectively increased intentions to quit, forgoing cigarettes, quit attempts, and successfully quitting smoking over 4 weeks. Our trial findings suggest that implementing pictorial warnings on cigarette packs in the United States would discourage smoking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02247908.
Authors: Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Sonia Boyum; Vetta S Thompson; Charlene A Caburnay; Erika A Waters; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Suchitra Rath; Qiang Fu Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Robert West; Witold Zatonski; Magdalena Cedzynska; Dorota Lewandowska; Joanna Pazik; Paul Aveyard; John Stapleton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James F Thrasher; Erika N Abad-Vivero; Liling Huang; Richard J O'Connor; David Hammond; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; Barry Markovsky; James Hardin Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Donna M Vallone; James F Thrasher; Rebekah H Nagler; Shari P Feirman; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Kasisomayajula Viswanath Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marissa G Hall; Allison J Lazard; Anna H Grummon; Jennifer R Mendel; Lindsey Smith Taillie Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: William G Shadel; Steven C Martino; Claude M Setodji; Michael Dunbar; Deborah Scharf; Kasey G Creswell Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: Chris Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Michael C Dorf; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sherri Jean Katz; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Amelia Greiner Safi; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Commun Monogr Date: 2019-07-18
Authors: Parth D Shah; William A Calo; Melissa B Gilkey; Marcella H Boynton; Susan Alton Dailey; Karen G Todd; Meagan O Robichaud; Marjorie A Margolis; Noel T Brewer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 7.124