Literature DB >> 31420374

Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers.

Yachao Li1, Bo Yang2, Daniel Owusu3, Lucy Popova4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cigarette pictorial warning labels (PWLs) could produce stronger quit intentions than text-only warning labels (TWLs) due to greater emotional arousal. Yet, it remains unclear whether PWLs that elicit different levels of emotions produce different outcomes. To better understand the role of negative emotions in the effects of PWLs, this study developed two sets of PWLs arousing different emotional levels (high vs low) but equally high on informativeness and compared them to each other and to the current TWLs.
METHODS: Adult US smokers (n=1503) were randomised to view nine high-emotion-arousing or low-emotion-arousing PWLs or TWLs. After each label, participants reported the negative emotions they felt while looking at the label. After seeing all the labels, participants reported their intentions to quit smoking. Mediation analyses tested whether message condition influenced quit intentions indirectly through negative emotions.
RESULTS: Compared with TWLs, PWLs produced higher levels of negative emotions (b=0.27, SE=0.04, p<0.001). Compared with low-emotion arousing PWLs, high-emotion-arousing PWLs produced higher levels of negative emotions (b=0.24, SE=0.07, p<0.001). Higher negative emotions predicted stronger quit intentions (b=0.20, SE=0.03, p<0.001). Negative emotions mediated the effects of PWLs versus TWLs and high-emotion-arousing versus low- emotion-arousing PWLs on quit intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide additional evidence for negative emotions as the mechanism through which PWLs motivate smokers to consider quitting. The findings call on the Food and Drug Administration to design and implement high-emotion-arousing cigarette warning labels. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cigarette warning labels; emotions; pictorial warning labels; quit intentions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31420374      PMCID: PMC7024028          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  26 in total

1.  Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years.

Authors:  R Borland; N Wilson; G T Fong; D Hammond; K M Cummings; H-H Yong; W Hosking; G Hastings; J Thrasher; A McNeill
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Do Emotions Spark Interest in Alternative Tobacco Products?

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Jiyeon So; Angeline Sangalang; Torsten B Neilands; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

3.  Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Cho; James F Thrasher; Hua-Hie Yong; André Salem Szklo; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; James Hardin; Ron Borland
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Cigarette graphic warning labels increase both risk perceptions and smoking myth endorsement.

Authors:  Abigail T Evans; Ellen Peters; Abigail B Shoben; Louise R Meilleur; Elizabeth G Klein; Mary Kate Tompkins; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  The evolution of health warning labels on cigarette packs: the role of precedents, and tobacco industry strategies to block diffusion.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Eric Crosbie; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

Review 8.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Humberto Parada; Trent O Johnson; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Marissa G Hall; Diane B Francis; Kurt M Ribisl; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reactions to graphic and text health warnings for cigarettes, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol: An online randomized experiment of US adults.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Anna H Grummon; Allison J Lazard; Olivia M Maynard; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Investigating the Relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Cigarette Smoking in University Students in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Zohreh Halvaiepour; Mehdi Nosratabadi
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2021-07-26

3.  Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Jessica L King; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Harm Perception in Response to Pictorial Warning Labels Predict Higher Non-Smoking Intention among Korean Adolescents.

Authors:  Jun Hyun Hwang; Soon-Woo Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Are smokers scared by COVID-19 risk? How fear and comparative optimism influence smokers' intentions to take measures to quit smoking.

Authors:  Hue Trong Duong; Zachary B Massey; Victoria Churchill; Lucy Popova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.