Literature DB >> 29248897

Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Marissa G Hall1,2, Paschal Sheeran1,3, Seth M Noar1,4, Marcella H Boynton1,2, Kurt M Ribisl1,2, Humberto Parada5, Trent O Johnson6, Noel T Brewer1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs increase motivation to quit smoking. We sought to examine the potential mediating role of negative affect, message reactance (ie, an oppositional reaction to a message) and perceived risk in shaping quit intentions.
METHODS: In 2014 and 2015, we randomly assigned 2149 adult US smokers to receive either pictorial warnings or text-only warnings applied to their cigarette packs for 4 weeks. Analyses used structural equation modelling with bootstrapped SEs to test our theorised mediational model.
FINDINGS: Pictorial warnings increased negative affect, message reactance and quit intentions (all P<0.001), but not perceived risk (ie, perceived likelihood and severity of harms of smoking). Negative affect mediated the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions (mediated effect=0.16, P<0.001). Message reactance weakened the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions, although the effect was small (mediated effect=-0.04, P<0.001). Although pictorial warnings did not directly influence perceived risk, the model showed additional small mediation effects on quit intentions through negative affect and its positive association with perceived risk (mediated effect=0.02, P<0.001), as well as reactance and its negative association with perceived risk (mediated effect=-0.01, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pictorial cigarette pack warnings increased quit intentions by increasing negative affect. Message reactance partially attenuated this increase in intentions. The opposing associations of negative affect and reactance on perceived risk may explain why pictorial warnings did not lead to observable changes in perceived risk. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cessation; packaging and labelling; public policy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248897      PMCID: PMC6004228          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  36 in total

1.  Fear, anger, and risk.

Authors:  J S Lerner; D Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Melissa L Finucane; Ellen Peters; Donald G MacGregor
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Testing warning messages on smokers' cigarette packages: a standardised protocol.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Joseph G L Lee; Kathryn Peebles; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Reactions to graphic health warnings in the United States.

Authors:  James M Nonnemaker; Conrad J Choiniere; Matthew C Farrelly; Kian Kamyab; Kevin C Davis
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-06-27

5.  The hundred-year emotion war: are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011).

Authors:  Kristen A Lindquist; Erika H Siegel; Karen S Quigley; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Adolescents' Responses to Pictorial Warnings on Their Parents' Cigarette Packs.

Authors:  Kathryn Peebles; Marissa G Hall; Jessica K Pepper; M Justin Byron; Seth M Noar; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Perceived risk and quitting behaviors: results from the ITC 4-country survey.

Authors:  Mary Jean Costello; Christine Logel; Geoffrey T Fong; Mark P Zanna; Paul W McDonald
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2012-09

9.  Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception.

Authors:  D Keltner; P C Ellsworth; K Edwards
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Recruiting Diverse Smokers: Enrollment Yields and Cost.

Authors:  Kaitlyn E Brodar; Marissa G Hall; Eboneé N Butler; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Sean Hanley; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  31 in total

1.  Understanding Why Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Quit Attempts.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Humberto Parada; Marissa G Hall; Marcella H Boynton; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Higher negative emotions in response to cigarette pictorial warning labels predict higher quit intentions among smokers.

Authors:  Yachao Li; Bo Yang; Daniel Owusu; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Independent or synergistic? Effects of varying size and using pictorial images in tobacco health warning labels.

Authors:  Chris Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Michael C Dorf; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Jennifer R Mendel; Seth M Noar; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Brittany Shoots-Reinhard; Abigail T Evans; Abigail Shoben; Elizabeth Klein; Mary Kate Tompkins; Daniel Romer; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-20

6.  Are the Same Health Warnings Effective Across Different Countries? An Experimental Study in Seven Countries.

Authors:  David Hammond; Jessica L Reid; Pete Driezen; James F Thrasher; Prakash C Gupta; Nigar Nargis; Qiang Li; Jiang Yuan; Christian Boudreau; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Some Risk Appraisals But Not Risk Beliefs: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Joshua O Barker; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2020-02-03

8.  Testing competing explanations for graphic warning label effects among adult smokers and non-smoking youth.

Authors:  Chris Skurka; Sahara Byrne; Julie Davydova; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Alan D Mathios; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig; Seth M Noar; Nisha C Gottfredson; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-17

10.  Ethical Considerations for Food and Beverage Warnings.

Authors:  Anna H Grummon; Marissa G Hall; Jason P Block; Sara N Bleich; Eric B Rimm; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Anne Barnhill
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.