Literature DB >> 20121865

Brainstem correlates of temporal auditory processing in children with specific language impairment.

Madhavi Basu1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Christine Weber-Fox.   

Abstract

Deficits in identification and discrimination of sounds with short inter-stimulus intervals or short formant transitions in children with specific language impairment (SLI) have been taken to reflect an underlying temporal auditory processing deficit. Using the sustained frequency following response (FFR) and the onset auditory brainstem responses (ABR) we evaluated if children with SLI show abnormalities at the brainstem level consistent with a temporal processing deficit. To this end, the neural encoding of tonal sweeps, as reflected in the FFR, for different rates of frequency change, and the effects of reducing inter-stimulus interval on the ABR components were evaluated in 10 4-11-year-old SLI children and their age-matched controls. Results for the SLI group showed degraded FFR phase-locked neural activity that failed to faithfully track the frequency change presented in the tonal sweeps, particularly at the faster sweep rates. SLI children also showed longer latencies for waves III and V of the ABR and a greater prolongation of wave III at high stimulus rates (>30/sec), suggesting greater susceptibility to neural adaptation. These results taken together appear to suggest a disruption in the temporal pattern of phase-locked neural activity necessary to encode rapid frequency change and an increased susceptibility to desynchronizing factors related to faster rates of stimulus presentation in children with SLI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121865     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00849.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  38 in total

1.  Behavioral profiles associated with auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment.

Authors:  Carol A Miller; David A Wagstaff
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 2.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The auditory brainstem response: latencies obtained in children while under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Linda W Norrix; Stacey Trepanier; Matthew Atlas; Darlyne Kim
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Developmental trends in auditory processing can provide early predictions of language acquisition in young infants.

Authors:  Weerasak Chonchaiya; Twila Tardif; Xiaoqin Mai; Lin Xu; Mingyan Li; Niko Kaciroti; Paul R Kileny; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-12-20

7.  Electrophysiological evidence for attenuated auditory recovery cycles in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens; David Paulsen; Alia Yasen; Leila Mitsunaga; Helen Neville
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

9.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.