Literature DB >> 18789971

Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study.

Idrick Akhoun1, Annie Moulin, Arnaud Jeanvoine, Mikael Ménard, François Buret, Christian Vollaire, Riccardo Scorretti, Evelyne Veuillet, Christian Berger-Vachon, Lionel Collet, Hung Thai-Van.   

Abstract

Speech elicited auditory brainstem responses (Speech ABR) have been shown to be an objective measurement of speech processing in the brainstem. Given the simultaneous stimulation and recording, and the similarities between the recording and the speech stimulus envelope, there is a great risk of artefactual recordings. This study sought to systematically investigate the source of artefactual contamination in Speech ABR response. In a first part, we measured the sound level thresholds over which artefactual responses were obtained, for different types of transducers and experimental setup parameters. A watermelon model was used to model the human head susceptibility to electromagnetic artefact. It was found that impedances between the electrodes had a great effect on electromagnetic susceptibility and that the most prominent artefact is due to the transducer's electromagnetic leakage. The only artefact-free condition was obtained with insert-earphones shielded in a Faraday cage linked to common ground. In a second part of the study, using the previously defined artefact-free condition, we recorded speech ABR in unilateral deaf subjects and bilateral normal hearing subjects. In an additional control condition, Speech ABR was recorded with the insert-earphones used to deliver the stimulation, unplugged from the ears, so that the subjects did not perceive the stimulus. No responses were obtained from the deaf ear of unilaterally hearing impaired subjects, nor in the insert-out-of-the-ear condition in all the subjects, showing that Speech ABR reflects the functioning of the auditory pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18789971     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  12 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.

Authors:  Milaine D Sanfins; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Caroline Donadon; Thais A Diniz; Leticia R Borges; Piotr H Skarzynski; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.

Authors:  A Tierney; A Parbery-Clark; E Skoe; N Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Comparing Sound-Field Speech-Auditory Brainstem Response Components between Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Recognition in Noise Scores.

Authors:  Farnoush Jarollahi; Ayub Valadbeigi; Bahram Jalaei; Mohammad Maarefvand; Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Hamid Haghani; Zahra Shirzhiyzn
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2022-03-14

7.  Frequency difference beyond behavioral limen reflected by frequency following response of human auditory Brainstem.

Authors:  Qin Xu; Qin Gong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Effect of Repetition Rate on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Younger and Middle Aged Individuals.

Authors:  Anuj Kumar Neupane; Krithika Gururaj; Garvita Mehta; Sujeet Kumar Sinha
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-09-18

9.  Contribution of Resolved and Unresolved Harmonic Regions to Brainstem Speech-Evoked Responses in Quiet and in Background Noise.

Authors:  M Laroche; H R Dajani; A M Marcoux
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-07

Review 10.  Parameters for Applying the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with Speech Stimulus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luísa Bello Gabriel; Luíza Silva Vernier; Maria Inês Dornelles da Costa Ferreira; Adriana Laybauer Silveira; Márcia Salgado Machado
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.