Literature DB >> 19346159

Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function.

S Dhar1, R Abel, J Hornickel, T Nicol, E Skoe, W Zhao, N Kraus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Otoacoustic emissions and the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response are objective indices of peripheral auditory physiology that are used clinically for assessing hearing function. While each measure has been extensively explored, their interdependence and the relationships between them remain relatively unexplored.
METHODS: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses (sABRs) were recorded from 28 normal-hearing adults. Through correlational analyses, DPOAE characteristics were compared to measures of sABR timing and frequency encoding. Data were organized into two DPOAE (Strength and Structure) and five brainstem (Onset, Spectrotemporal, Harmonics, Envelope Boundary, and Pitch) composite measures.
RESULTS: DPOAE Strength shows significant relationships with sABR Spectrotemporal and Harmonics measures. DPOAE Structure shows significant relationships with sABR Envelope Boundary. Neither DPOAE Strength nor Structure is related to sABR Pitch.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that certain aspects of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses are related to, or covary with, cochlear function as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. SIGNIFICANCE: These results form a foundation for future work in clinical populations. Analyzing cochlear and brainstem function in parallel in different clinical populations will provide a more sensitive clinical battery for identifying the locus of different disorders (e.g., language based learning impairments, hearing impairment).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19346159      PMCID: PMC2751805          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  46 in total

Review 1.  Brainstem origins for cortical 'what' and 'where' pathways in the auditory system.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Trent Nicol
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Yisheng Xu; Jackson Gandour; Peter Cariani
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

3.  Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; A Tubis; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Cochlear transduction: an integrative model and review.

Authors:  W E Brownell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

9.  Effects of a suppressor tone on distortion product otoacoustic emissions fine structure: why a universal suppressor level is not a practical solution to obtaining single-generator DP-grams.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Lauren A Shaffer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  23 in total

1.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 3.  An Analysis of The Parameters Used In Speech ABR Assessment Protocols.

Authors:  Milaine D Sanfins; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Caroline Donadon; Thais A Diniz; Leticia R Borges; Piotr H Skarzynski; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Rapid acoustic processing in the auditory brainstem is not related to cortical asymmetry for the syllable rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Jennifer Krizman; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Neural Encoding of Speech and Music: Implications for Hearing Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2011-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.