Literature DB >> 29735195

Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization.

Jan Unkelbach1, Harald Paganetti2.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of tumor control and toxicities in radiation therapy faces many uncertainties. Besides interpatient variability in the response to radiation, there are also dosimetric uncertainties, that is, differences between the dose displayed in a treatment planning system and the dose actually delivered to the patient. These uncertainties originate from several sources including imperfect knowledge of the patient geometry, approximation in the physics of radiation interaction with tissues, and uncertainties in the biological effectiveness of radiation. Generally, uncertainties are considered in the treatment planning process by applying margins. In intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), this leads to the planning target volume (PTV) concept. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is widely considered as the future of proton therapy. The treatment planning methods for IMPT and IMRT are similar and based on mathematical optimization techniques for both modalities. However, the PTV concept has fundamental limitations in IMPT. Therefore, researchers have developed robust optimization methods that directly incorporate uncertainties into the IMPT optimization problem. In recent years, vendors of commercial planning systems have started to implement these methods so that robust IMPT planning becomes available in clinical practice. This article summarizes uncertainties in proton therapy and the limitations of the PTV concept to deal with them. Subsequently, robust optimization techniques to overcome these limitations are reviewed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29735195      PMCID: PMC5942229          DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  44 in total

1.  Inverse planning for photon and proton beams.

Authors:  U Oelfke; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Thomas Bortfeld; Benjamin C Martin; Martin Soukup
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; David Craft; Andrzej Niemierko; Alexei Trofimov; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Pablo Botas; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Bram L Gorissen; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Analytical probabilistic modeling for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Mark Bangert; Philipp Hennig; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  22 in total

1.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: Comparison of advanced techniques.

Authors:  Yibo Xie; Daniel Bourgeois; Beibei Guo; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.482

Review 2.  Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning.

Authors:  Aimee McNamara; Henning Willers; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 8.013

6.  Reduce Patient Treatment wait time in a Proton Beam Facility - A Gatekeeper Approach.

Authors:  Yu-Li Huang; Amanda J Deisher; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability.

Authors:  Rosalinda Ricotti; Andrea Pella; Barbara Tagaste; Giovanni Elisei; Giulia Fontana; Maria Bonora; Mario Ciocca; Francesca Valvo; Roberto Orecchia; Guido Baroni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Assessment of a diaphragm override strategy for robustly optimized proton therapy planning for esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sabine Visser; Hendrike Neh; Cássia Oraboni Ribeiro; Erik W Korevaar; Arturs Meijers; Björn Poppe; Nanna M Sijtsema; Stefan Both; Johannes A Langendijk; Christina T Muijs; Antje C Knopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 10.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.