Literature DB >> 27869082

Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Jan Unkelbach1, Pablo Botas2, Drosoula Giantsoudi3, Bram L Gorissen3, Harald Paganetti3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe a treatment plan optimization method for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) that avoids high values of linear energy transfer (LET) in critical structures located within or near the target volume while limiting degradation of the best possible physical dose distribution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To allow fast optimization based on dose and LET, a GPU-based Monte Carlo code was extended to provide dose-averaged LET in addition to dose for all pencil beams. After optimizing an initial IMPT plan based on physical dose, a prioritized optimization scheme is used to modify the LET distribution while constraining the physical dose objectives to values close to the initial plan. The LET optimization step is performed based on objective functions evaluated for the product of LET and physical dose (LET×D). To first approximation, LET×D represents a measure of the additional biological dose that is caused by high LET.
RESULTS: The method is effective for treatments where serial critical structures with maximum dose constraints are located within or near the target. We report on 5 patients with intracranial tumors (high-grade meningiomas, base-of-skull chordomas, ependymomas) in whom the target volume overlaps with the brainstem and optic structures. In all cases, high LET×D in critical structures could be avoided while minimally compromising physical dose planning objectives.
CONCLUSION: LET-based reoptimization of IMPT plans represents a pragmatic approach to bridge the gap between purely physical dose-based and relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-based planning. The method makes IMPT treatments safer by mitigating a potentially increased risk of side effects resulting from elevated RBE of proton beams near the end of range.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27869082      PMCID: PMC5133459          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  IMRT treatment planning based on prioritizing prescription goals.

Authors:  Jan J Wilkens; James R Alaly; Konstantin Zakarian; Wade L Thorstad; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Linear energy transfer painting with proton therapy: a means of reducing radiation doses with equivalent clinical effectiveness.

Authors:  Marcus Fager; Iuliana Toma-Dasu; Maura Kirk; Derek Dolney; Eric S Diffenderfer; Neha Vapiwala; Alejandro Carabe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes.

Authors:  Minna Wedenberg; Bengt K Lind; Björn Hårdemark
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; David Craft; Andrzej Niemierko; Alexei Trofimov; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo code (gPMC) for proton radiation therapy: clinical cases study.

Authors:  Drosoula Giantsoudi; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Stephen Dowdell; Steve Jiang; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy.

Authors:  Fada Guan; Lawrence Bronk; Uwe Titt; Steven H Lin; Dragan Mirkovic; Matthew D Kerr; X Ronald Zhu; Jeffrey Dinh; Mary Sobieski; Clifford Stephan; Christopher R Peeler; Reza Taleei; Radhe Mohan; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  39 in total

1.  Developing Predictive or Prognostic Biomarkers for Charged Particle Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Story; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018

Review 2.  Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 3.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE): a multiscale problem.

Authors:  Tracy Sa Underwood; Stephen J McMahon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Azin Khabazian; Pablo P Yepes; Gino Lim; Falk Poenisch; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Particle Radiation Induced Neurotoxicity in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  David R Grosshans; Joseph G Duman; M Waleed Gaber; Gabriel Sawakuchi
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 8.  Radiobiological issues in proton therapy.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Christopher R Peeler; Fada Guan; Lawrence Bronk; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 9.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.