Literature DB >> 34710858

Adaptive proton therapy.

Harald Paganetti1,2, Pablo Botas1,2,3, Gregory C Sharp1,2, Brian Winey1,2.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy treatments are typically planned based on a single image set, assuming that the patient's anatomy and its position relative to the delivery system remains constant during the course of treatment. Similarly, the prescription dose assumes constant biological dose-response over the treatment course. However, variations can and do occur on multiple time scales. For treatment sites with significant intra-fractional motion, geometric changes happen over seconds or minutes, while biological considerations change over days or weeks. At an intermediate timescale, geometric changes occur between daily treatment fractions. Adaptive radiation therapy is applied to consider changes in patient anatomy during the course of fractionated treatment delivery. While traditionally adaptation has been done off-line with replanning based on new CT images, online treatment adaptation based on on-board imaging has gained momentum in recent years due to advanced imaging techniques combined with treatment delivery systems. Adaptation is particularly important in proton therapy where small changes in patient anatomy can lead to significant dose perturbations due to the dose conformality and finite range of proton beams. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art of on-line adaptive proton therapy and identifies areas requiring further research.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive radiation therapy; online adaptation; proton therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34710858      PMCID: PMC8628198          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  261 in total

1.  Radiotherapy adapted to spatial and temporal variability in tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  Aste Søvik; Eirik Malinen; Hege K Skogmo; Søren M Bentzen; Oyvind S Bruland; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Adaptive prostate IGRT combining online re-optimization and re-positioning: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Taoran Li; Danthai Thongphiew; Xiaofeng Zhu; W Robert Lee; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Fang-Fang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Sub-second pencil beam dose calculation on GPU for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Joakim da Silva; Richard Ansorge; Rajesh Jena
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Independent dose calculations for commissioning, quality assurance and dose reconstruction of PBS proton therapy.

Authors:  G Meier; R Besson; A Nanz; S Safai; A J Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  CBCT correction using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network and unpaired training to enable photon and proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Matteo Maspero; Mark H F Savenije; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Marco Pinto; Minglun Li; Katia Parodi; Claus Belka; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Cone-beam CT-derived relative stopping power map generation via deep learning for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph Harms; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Mark McDonald; Beth Ghavidel; William Stokes; Walter J Curran; Jun Zhou; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Heng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Peter Park; Wei Liu; Joe Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Steve Frank; Yupeng Li; Falk Poenisch; Radhe Mohan; Michael Gillin; Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Jan Schümann; Harald Paganetti; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Quality Improvement Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Satoshi Kida; Takahiro Nakamoto; Masahiro Nakano; Kanabu Nawa; Akihiro Haga; Jun'ichi Kotoku; Hideomi Yamashita; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-04-29

10.  Combined Inter- and Intrafractional Plan Adaptation Using Fraction Partitioning in Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy Delivery.

Authors:  Frank Lagerwaard; Omar Bohoudi; Shyama Tetar; Marjan A Admiraal; Tezontl S Rosario; Anna Bruynzeel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-04-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Adaptive Proton Therapy of Pediatric Head and Neck Cases Using MRI-Based Synthetic CTs: Initial Experience of the Prospective KiAPT Study.

Authors:  Christian Bäumer; Rezarta Frakulli; Jessica Kohl; Sindhu Nagaraja; Theresa Steinmeier; Rasin Worawongsakul; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Evaluating Proton Dose and Associated Range Uncertainty Using Daily Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Heng Li; William T Hrinivich; Hao Chen; Khadija Sheikh; Meng Wei Ho; Rachel Ger; Dezhi Liu; Russell Kenneth Hales; Khinh Ranh Voong; Aditya Halthore; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Yinxiangzi Sheng; Marco Durante; Christian Graeff
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans.

Authors:  Lena Nenoff; Gregory Buti; Mislav Bobić; Arthur Lalonde; Konrad P Nesteruk; Brian Winey; Gregory Charles Sharp; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  In-vivo range verification analysis with in-beam PET data for patients treated with proton therapy at CNAO.

Authors:  Martina Moglioni; Aafke Christine Kraan; Guido Baroni; Giuseppe Battistoni; Nicola Belcari; Andrea Berti; Pietro Carra; Piergiorgio Cerello; Mario Ciocca; Angelica De Gregorio; Micol De Simoni; Damiano Del Sarto; Marco Donetti; Yunsheng Dong; Alessia Embriaco; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Veronica Ferrero; Elisa Fiorina; Marta Fischetti; Gaia Franciosini; Giuseppe Giraudo; Francesco Laruina; Davide Maestri; Marco Magi; Giuseppe Magro; Etesam Malekzadeh; Michela Marafini; Ilaria Mattei; Enrico Mazzoni; Paolo Mereu; Alfredo Mirandola; Matteo Morrocchi; Silvia Muraro; Ester Orlandi; Vincenzo Patera; Francesco Pennazio; Marco Pullia; Alessandra Retico; Angelo Rivetti; Manuel Dionisio Da Rocha Rolo; Valeria Rosso; Alessio Sarti; Angelo Schiavi; Adalberto Sciubba; Giancarlo Sportelli; Sara Tampellini; Marco Toppi; Giacomo Traini; Antonio Trigilio; Serena Marta Valle; Francesca Valvo; Barbara Vischioni; Viviana Vitolo; Richard Wheadon; Maria Giuseppina Bisogni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Authors:  Binwei Lin; Dan Huang; Feng Gao; Yiwei Yang; Dai Wu; Yu Zhang; Gang Feng; Tangzhi Dai; Xiaobo Du
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.