Literature DB >> 31738081

Modelling variable proton relative biological effectiveness for treatment planning.

Aimee McNamara1, Henning Willers, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

Dose in proton radiotherapy is generally prescribed by scaling the physical proton dose by a constant value of 1.1. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is defined as the ratio of doses required by two radiation modalities to cause the same level of biological effect. The adoption of an RBE of 1.1. assumes that the biological efficacy of protons is similar to photons, allowing decades of clinical dose prescriptions from photon treatments and protocols to be utilized in proton therapy. There is, however, emerging experimental evidence that indicates that proton RBE varies based on technical, tissue and patient factors. The notion that a single scaling factor may be used to equate the effects of photons and protons across all biological endpoints and doses is too simplistic and raises concern for treatment planning decisions. Here, we review the models that have been developed to better predict RBE variations in tissue based on experimental data as well as using a mechanistic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31738081      PMCID: PMC7066955          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  68 in total

1.  Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Alejandro Carabe; Maryam Moteabbed; Nicolas Depauw; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A comparison of the in vivo and in vitro radiation response of three human cervix carcinomas.

Authors:  K S Tonkin; L R Kelland; G G Steel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC.

Authors:  Werner Friedland; Michael Dingfelder; Pavel Kundrát; Peter Jacob
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Y Chen; S Ahmad
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  A microdosimetric-kinetic model of cell death from exposure to ionizing radiation of any LET, with experimental and clinical applications.

Authors:  R B Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Variable Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness: How Do We Move Forward?

Authors:  Tracy Underwood; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A quantitative comparison of potentially lethal damage repair and the rejoining of interphase chromosome breaks in low passage normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  M N Cornforth; J S Bedford
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  The influence of RBE variations in a clinical proton treatment plan for a hypopharynx cancer.

Authors:  N Tilly; J Johansson; U Isacsson; J Medin; E Blomquist; E Grusell; B Glimelius
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Toward A variable RBE for proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Henning Willers; Antino Allen; David Grosshans; Stephen J McMahon; Cläre von Neubeck; Claudia Wiese; Bhadrasain Vikram
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Data-driven RBE parameterization for helium ion beams.

Authors:  A Mairani; G Magro; I Dokic; S M Valle; T Tessonnier; R Galm; M Ciocca; K Parodi; A Ferrari; O Jäkel; T Haberer; P Pedroni; T T Böhlen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

1.  Proton therapy special feature: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held; Antony J Lomax; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Perspectives on the model-based approach to proton therapy trials: A retrospective study of a lung cancer randomized trial.

Authors:  Aimee L McNamara; David C Hall; Nadya Shusharina; Amy Liu; Xiong Wei; Ali Ajdari; Radhe Mohan; Zhongxing Liao; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Eren Celik; Wolfgang Baus; Christian Baues; Wolfgang Schröder; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Marta Scorsetti; Simone Marnitz; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  The Potential Role of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy in Hepatic Carcinoma in Mitigating the Risk of Dose De-Escalation.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Tiziana Comito; Mauro Loi; Antonella Fogliata; Ciro Franzese; Davide Franceschini; Elena Clerici; Giacomo Reggiori; Stefano Tomatis; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Quantification of biological range uncertainties in patients treated at the Krakow proton therapy centre.

Authors:  Magdalena Garbacz; Jan Gajewski; Marco Durante; Kamil Kisielewicz; Nils Krah; Renata Kopeć; Paweł Olko; Vincenzo Patera; Ilaria Rinaldi; Marzena Rydygier; Angelo Schiavi; Emanuele Scifoni; Tomasz Skóra; Agata Skrzypek; Francesco Tommasino; Antoni Rucinski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: State of the Problem and Development Prospects (Review).

Authors:  K B Gordon; D I Smyk; I A Gulidov
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2021-08-28

8.  RBE-weighted dose and its impact on the risk of acute coronary event for breast cancer patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Chunbo Liu; Julie A Bradley; Dandan Zheng; Raymond B Mailhot Vega; Chris J Beltran; Nancy Mendenhall; Xiaoying Liang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.