Literature DB >> 15789592

Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.

Jan J Wilkens1, Uwe Oelfke.   

Abstract

Today, inverse treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) usually employs a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE). In this paper, the potential clinical relevance of RBE variations for scanning techniques in IMPT is investigated, and a new strategy to include the RBE into the inverse planning process is presented. Three-dimensional RBE distributions are calculated based on a phenomenological model that describes the RBE as a function of dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and tissue type in the framework of the linear-quadratic model. This RBE model is integrated into the optimization loop of inverse planning by using a modified version of the standard quadratic objective function, where the physical dose is replaced by the biological effect. This system for "biological optimization" was implemented into a research version of the inverse planning software KonRad and allows the direct optimization of the product of RBE and physical dose. Several treatment plans for a prostate case are presented, which compare the biological with the conventional physical dose optimization for IMPT scanning techniques, in particular distal edge tracking (DET) and the full three-dimensional (3D) modulation of beam spots. Mainly due to their different LET distributions, the RBE effects for these two techniques are quite different: while the RBE distribution was more or less homogeneous in the planning target volume (PTV) for 3D modulation, considerable RBE variations within the PTV were observed for DET. These unfavorable effects could be compensated for by employing the new biological objective function, which led to a more homogeneous distribution of the product of RBE and physical dose in the PTV. The computation time increased by a factor of 2 compared to the optimization of the physical dose. In conclusion, the proposed method allows the simultaneous multifield optimization of the biological effect in a reasonable time, and is therefore well suited for studying the influence of a variable RBE in IMPT as well as for minimizing potentially adverse effects.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789592     DOI: 10.1118/1.1851925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

Review 1.  Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Azin Khabazian; Pablo P Yepes; Gino Lim; Falk Poenisch; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Comparing Photon and Charged Particle Therapy Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shayoni Ray; Egle Cekanaviciute; Ivan Paulino Lima; Brita Singers Sørensen; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 4.  Radiobiological issues in proton therapy.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Christopher R Peeler; Fada Guan; Lawrence Bronk; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  New strategies in radiation therapy: exploiting the full potential of protons.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Anita Mahajan; Bruce D Minsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Pablo Botas; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Bram L Gorissen; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A new approach to integrate GPU-based Monte Carlo simulation into inverse treatment plan optimization for proton therapy.

Authors:  Yongbao Li; Zhen Tian; Ting Song; Zhaoxia Wu; Yaqiang Liu; Steve Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; John G Eley; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Full Monte Carlo-Based Biologic Treatment Plan Optimization System for Intensity Modulated Carbon Ion Therapy on Graphics Processing Unit.

Authors:  Nan Qin; Chenyang Shen; Min-Yu Tsai; Marco Pinto; Zhen Tian; Georgios Dedes; Arnold Pompos; Steve B Jiang; Katia Parodi; Xun Jia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.

Authors:  Yu An; Jie Shan; Samir H Patel; William Wong; Steven E Schild; Xiaoning Ding; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.