Literature DB >> 23877218

Analytical probabilistic modeling for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Mark Bangert1, Philipp Hennig, Uwe Oelfke.   

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of analytical probabilistic modeling (APM) to quantify uncertainties in quality indicators of radiation therapy treatment plans. Assuming Gaussian probability densities over the input parameters of the treatment plan quality indicators, APM enables the calculation of the moments of the induced probability density over the treatment plan quality indicators by analytical integration. This paper focuses on analytical probabilistic dose calculation algorithms and the implications of APM regarding treatment planning. We derive closed-form expressions for the expectation value and the (co)variance of (1) intensity-modulated photon and proton dose distributions based on a pencil beam algorithm and (2) the standard quadratic objective function used in inverse planning. Complex correlation models of high dimensional uncertain input parameters and the different nature of random and systematic uncertainties in fractionated radiation therapy are explicitly incorporated into APM. APM variance calculations on phantom data sets show that the correlation assumptions and the difference of random and systematic uncertainties of the input parameters have a crucial impact on the uncertainty of the resulting dose. The derivations regarding the quadratic objective function show that APM has the potential to enable robust planning at almost the same computational cost like conventional inverse planning after a single probabilistic dose calculation. Beneficial applications of APM in the context of radiation therapy treatment planning are feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877218     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  Robust Proton Treatment Planning: Physical and Biological Optimization.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Min-Yu Tsai; Xun Jia; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Spatiotemporal fractionation schemes for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Dávid Papp; Melissa R Gaddy; Nicolaus Andratschke; Theodore Hong; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Worst case optimization for interfractional motion mitigation in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Julian Steitz; Patrick Naumann; Silke Ulrich; Matthias F Haefner; Florian Sterzing; Uwe Oelfke; Mark Bangert
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Physically constrained voxel-based penalty adaptation for ultra-fast IMRT planning.

Authors:  Niklas Wahl; Mark Bangert; Cornelis P Kamerling; Peter Ziegenhein; Gijsbert H Bol; Bas W Raaymakers; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.