Tuomas Mutanen1, Hanna Mäki, Risto J Ilmoniemi. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, Aalto University, PO Box 12200, FI-00076 Aalto, Espoo, Finland. tuomas.mutanen@aalto.fi
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is delivered close to the lateral aspects of the head, large-amplitude (~10-1000 μV) biphasic electroencephalographic (EEG) deflections, peaking at around 4-10 and 8-20 ms, appear. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the spatiotemporal features of these artifacts, to quantify the effect of stimulus parameters on them, and thus, to study the feasibility of different measurement procedures to decrease the artifacts online. Furthermore, to show that these deflections, when measured with a sample-and-hold system, mainly result from excitation of cranial muscles. METHODS: Three subjects received TMS to 16 sites over the left hemisphere. TMS-compatible EEG was recorded simultaneously. Four other subjects received TMS to M1 with different coil rotation and tilt angles and stimulation intensities. We also stimulated a conductive phantom and recorded simultaneous EEG to exclude the possibility of residual electromagnetic artifacts. RESULTS: The artifacts were largest when the stimulator was placed above cranial muscles, whereas stimulation of relatively central sites far from the muscles produced muscle artifact-free data. The laterally situated EEG channels were most severely contaminated. The artifacts were significantly reduced when reducing the intensity or when tilting or rotating the coil so that coil wings moved further away from the temporal muscle, while brain responses remained visible. Stimulation of the phantom did not produce such large-amplitude biphasic artifacts. CONCLUSION: Altering the stimulation parameters can reduce the described artifact, while brain responses can still be recorded. The early, laterally appearing, large biphasic TMS-evoked EEG deflections recorded with a sample-and-hold system are caused by cranial muscle activation.
BACKGROUND: When transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is delivered close to the lateral aspects of the head, large-amplitude (~10-1000 μV) biphasic electroencephalographic (EEG) deflections, peaking at around 4-10 and 8-20 ms, appear. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the spatiotemporal features of these artifacts, to quantify the effect of stimulus parameters on them, and thus, to study the feasibility of different measurement procedures to decrease the artifacts online. Furthermore, to show that these deflections, when measured with a sample-and-hold system, mainly result from excitation of cranial muscles. METHODS: Three subjects received TMS to 16 sites over the left hemisphere. TMS-compatible EEG was recorded simultaneously. Four other subjects received TMS to M1 with different coil rotation and tilt angles and stimulation intensities. We also stimulated a conductive phantom and recorded simultaneous EEG to exclude the possibility of residual electromagnetic artifacts. RESULTS: The artifacts were largest when the stimulator was placed above cranial muscles, whereas stimulation of relatively central sites far from the muscles produced muscle artifact-free data. The laterally situated EEG channels were most severely contaminated. The artifacts were significantly reduced when reducing the intensity or when tilting or rotating the coil so that coil wings moved further away from the temporal muscle, while brain responses remained visible. Stimulation of the phantom did not produce such large-amplitude biphasic artifacts. CONCLUSION: Altering the stimulation parameters can reduce the described artifact, while brain responses can still be recorded. The early, laterally appearing, large biphasic TMS-evoked EEG deflections recorded with a sample-and-hold system are caused by cranial muscle activation.
Authors: Sein Schmidt; Rouven Bathe-Peters; Robert Fleischmann; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Mouhsin M Shafi; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Catherine J Chu; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Bernard S Chang Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-11-13 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Laura M Rowland; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Gregor Thut; Til Ole Bergmann; Flavio Fröhlich; Surjo R Soekadar; John-Stuart Brittain; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Alexander T Sack; Carlo Miniussi; Andrea Antal; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Ulf Ziemann; Christoph S Herrmann Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 3.708