Literature DB >> 24259550

A novel protocol to investigate motor training-induced plasticity and sensorimotor integration in the cerebellum and motor cortex.

Julianne Baarbé1, Paul Yielder, Julian Daligadu, Hushyar Behbahani, Heidi Haavik, Bernadette Murphy.   

Abstract

Our group set out to develop a sensitive technique, capable of detecting output changes from the posterior fossa following a motor acquisition task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the right cerebellar cortex 5 ms in advance of test stimuli over the left cerebral motor cortex (M1), suppressing test motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded in a distal hand muscle. Ten participants typed the letters Z, D, F, and P in randomized 8-letter sequences for ∼15 min, and 10 participants took part in the control condition. Cerebellar-M1 recruitment curves were established before and after the motor acquisition task. Cerebellar inhibition at 50% (CBI50) was defined as the intensity of cerebellar-M1 stimulations that produced MEPs that were 50% of the initial test MEP. Collection also occurred at stimulator intensities 5 and 10% above CBI50. A significant interaction effect of group (experimental and control) vs. time (pre- and postintervention) was observed [F(1,18) = 4.617, P = 0.046]. Post hoc tests showed a significant effect for the learning task in the experimental group [F(1,9) = 10.28, P = 0.01]. Further analysis showed specific disinhibition at CBI50 (P = 0.04), CBI50+5% (P = 0.008), and CBI50+10% (P = 0.01) for the experimental group only. Reaction time (P < 0.001) and accuracy (P = 0.006) improved significantly following practice, implying that disinhibition coincides with motor learning. No changes, however, were seen in the control condition. We conclude that this protocol is a sensitive technique that may be used to study cerebellar disinhibition with motor acquisition in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; motor acquisition task; noninvasive cerebellar stimulation; plasticity; sensorimotor integration; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24259550     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00661.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  The Impact of Stimulation Intensity and Coil Type on Reliability and Tolerability of Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) via Dual-Coil TMS.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cortical Synaptic Inhibition Declines during Auditory Learning.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Gardiner von Trapp; Todd M Mowery; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Modulation of cerebellar brain inhibition during temporal adaptive learning in a coincident timing task.

Authors:  Shin-Ya Tanaka; Masato Hirano; Kozo Funase
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of subclinical neck pain on sensorimotor integration following a complex motor pursuit task.

Authors:  Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder; Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Functional Brain Activity Relates to 0-3 and 3-8 Hz Force Oscillations in Essential Tremor.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ajay S Kurani; Priyank Shukla; Peggy J Planetta; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Jennifer G Goldman; Daniel M Corcos; Michael S Okun; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Neck muscle fatigue impacts plasticity and sensorimotor integration in cerebellum and motor cortex in response to novel motor skill acquisition.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Zabihhosseinian; Paul Yielder; Victoria Berkers; Ushani Ambalavanar; Michael Holmes; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum improves handwriting and cyclic drawing kinematics in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Lynton J Graetz; Michelle N McDonnell; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Early Sensory Deprivation Leads to Differential Inhibitory Changes in the Striatum During Learning.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Todd M Mowery
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.