Literature DB >> 33978934

Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review.

George M Opie1, Wei-Yeh Liao1, John G Semmler2.   

Abstract

Interactions between cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1) are critical for effective motor function. Although the associated neurophysiological processes are yet to be fully characterised, a growing body of work using non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques has significantly progressed our current understanding. In particular, recent developments with both transcranial magnetic (TMS) and direct current (tDCS) stimulation suggest that CB modulates the activity of local excitatory interneuronal circuits within M1. These circuits are known to be important both physiologically and functionally, and understanding the nature of their connectivity with CB therefore has the potential to provide important insight for NIBS applications. Consequently, this mini-review provides an overview of the emerging literature that has investigated interactions between CB and the intracortical excitatory circuits of M1.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracortical excitability; Motor cortex; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33978934     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01278-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  58 in total

1.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; E Saturno; F Pilato; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Profice; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Nagako Murase; Alkomiet Hasan; Michelle Balaratnam; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  'I-wave' Recruitment Determines Response to tDCS in the Upper Limb, but Only So Far.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Sarah Wiethoff; Masashi Hamada; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shabnam Behrangrad; Maryam Zoghi; Dawson Kidgell; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Assessing cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): A systematic review.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Brendan P Major; Wei-Peng Teo; Linda K Byrne; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  The Errors of Our Ways: Understanding Error Representations in Cerebellar-Dependent Motor Learning.

Authors:  Laurentiu S Popa; Martha L Streng; Angela L Hewitt; Timothy J Ebner
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Haiyin Chen; Sherwin E Hua; Maurice A Smith; Frederick A Lenz; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Consensus Paper: Towards a Systems-Level View of Cerebellar Function: the Interplay Between Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex.

Authors:  Daniele Caligiore; Giovanni Pezzulo; Gianluca Baldassarre; Andreea C Bostan; Peter L Strick; Kenji Doya; Rick C Helmich; Michiel Dirkx; James Houk; Henrik Jörntell; Angel Lago-Rodriguez; Joseph M Galea; R Chris Miall; Traian Popa; Asha Kishore; Paul F M J Verschure; Riccardo Zucca; Ivan Herreros
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Effect of Cerebellar rTMS on Modulating Motor Dysfunction in Neurological Disorders: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yifei Xia; Mingqi Wang; Yulian Zhu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.648

2.  Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Lidio Lima de Albuquerque; Milan Pantovic; Mitchell G Clingo; Katherine M Fischer; Sharon Jalene; Merrill R Landers; Zoltan Mari; Brach Poston
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.648

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.