Literature DB >> 35226342

Cerebello-Motor Paired Associative Stimulation and Motor Recovery in Stroke: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Trial.

Charlotte Rosso1,2,3, Eric Jr Moulton4,5, Claire Kemlin4,5, Sara Leder6, Jean-Christophe Corvol4,5,7, Sophien Mehdi4,8, Mickael A Obadia9, Mickael Obadia9, Marion Yger10, Elena Meseguer11,12, Vincent Perlbarg8, Romain Valabregue8, Serena Magno4,5, Pavel Lindberg13, Sabine Meunier4, Jean-Charles Lamy4,8.   

Abstract

Cerebellum is a key structure for functional motor recovery after stroke. Enhancing the cerebello-motor pathway by paired associative stimulation (PAS) might improve upper limb function. Here, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial investigating the efficacy of a 5-day treatment of cerebello-motor PAS coupled with physiotherapy for promoting upper limb motor function compared to sham stimulation. The secondary objectives were to determine in the active treated group (i) whether improvement of upper limb motor function was associated with changes in corticospinal excitability or changes in functional activity in the primary motor cortex and (ii) whether improvements were correlated to the structural integrity of the input and output pathways. To that purpose, hand dexterity and maximal grip strength were assessed along with TMS recordings and multimodal magnetic resonance imaging, before the first treatment, immediately after the last one and a month later. Twenty-seven patients were analyzed. Cerebello-motor PAS was effective compared to sham in improving hand dexterity (p: 0.04) but not grip strength. This improvement was associated with increased activation in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (p: 0.04). Moreover, the inter-individual variability in clinical improvement was partly explained by the structural integrity of the afferent (p: 0.06) and efferent pathways (p: 0.02) engaged in this paired associative stimulation (i.e., cortico-spinal and dentato-thalamo-cortical tracts). In conclusion, cerebello-motor-paired associative stimulation combined with physiotherapy might be a promising approach to enhance upper limb motor function after stroke.Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02284087.
© 2022. The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Diffusion tensor imaging; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Stroke; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35226342      PMCID: PMC9226244          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01205-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   6.088


  43 in total

Review 1.  Consolidation of motor memory.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review.

Authors:  M Kandel; J-M Beis; L Le Chapelain; H Guesdon; J Paysant
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-09-29

Review 3.  A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  S Groppa; A Oliviero; A Eisen; A Quartarone; L G Cohen; V Mall; A Kaelin-Lang; T Mima; S Rossi; G W Thickbroom; P M Rossini; U Ziemann; J Valls-Solé; H R Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Hsu; Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Kwong-Kum Liao; I-Hui Lee; Yung-Yang Lin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Affected and unaffected quantitative aspects of grip force control in hemiparetic patients after stroke.

Authors:  Påvel G Lindberg; Nicolas Roche; Johanna Robertson; Agnès Roby-Brami; Bernard Bussel; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas--relevance to stroke recovery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Newton; Nick S Ward; Geoffrey J M Parker; Ralf Deichmann; Daniel C Alexander; Karl J Friston; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Chronic electrical stimulation of the contralesional lateral cerebellar nucleus enhances recovery of motor function after cerebral ischemia in rats.

Authors:  Andre G Machado; Kenneth B Baker; Daniel Schuster; Robert S Butler; Ali Rezai
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Cortico-Cerebellar Structural Connectivity Is Related to Residual Motor Output in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Robert Schulz; Benedikt M Frey; Philipp Koch; Maximo Zimerman; Marlene Bönstrup; Jan Feldheim; Jan E Timmermann; Gerhard Schön; Bastian Cheng; Götz Thomalla; Christian Gerloff; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; Y Uesaka; Y Terao; R Hanajima; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  A systematic review of non-motor rTMS induced motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Grégory Nordmann; Valeriya Azorina; Berthold Langguth; Martin Schecklmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Effect of Cerebellar rTMS on Modulating Motor Dysfunction in Neurological Disorders: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yifei Xia; Mingqi Wang; Yulian Zhu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 2.  Inter-brain plasticity as a biological mechanism of change in psychotherapy: A review and integrative model.

Authors:  Haran Sened; Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Simone Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.