Literature DB >> 29621457

Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.

Stephanie A Kraft1, Mildred K Cho2, Katherine Gillespie3, Meghan Halley3, Nina Varsava2, Kelly E Ormond2, Harold S Luft3, Benjamin S Wilfond1, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee2.   

Abstract

With the growth of precision medicine research on health data and biospecimens, research institutions will need to build and maintain long-term, trusting relationships with patient-participants. While trust is important for all research relationships, the longitudinal nature of precision medicine research raises particular challenges for facilitating trust when the specifics of future studies are unknown. Based on focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse patients, we describe several factors that influence patient trust and potential institutional approaches to building trustworthiness. Drawing on these findings, we suggest several considerations for research institutions seeking to cultivate long-term, trusting relationships with patients: (1) Address the role of history and experience on trust, (2) engage concerns about potential group harm, (3) address cultural values and communication barriers, and (4) integrate patient values and expectations into oversight and governance structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobank; electronic medical records; genetic research; informed consent; precision medicine; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29621457      PMCID: PMC6173191          DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  51 in total

1.  Restoring and preserving trust in biomedical research.

Authors:  Mark Yarborough; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; Michael M Burgess; Kelly Edwards; Richard P Gallagher; Alice K Hawkins; Jane Kaye; Veronica McCaffrey; David E Winickoff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research.

Authors:  N E Kass; J Sugarman; R Faden; M Schoch-Spana
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Medical Researchers' Ancillary Care Obligations: The Relationship-Based Approach.

Authors:  Nate W Olson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 5.  The role of patient advocacy organizations in shaping genomic science.

Authors:  Pei P Koay; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Secondary researchers' duties to return incidental findings and individual research results: a partial-entrustment account.

Authors:  Henry S Richardson; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.

Authors:  Cathie Sudlow; John Gallacher; Naomi Allen; Valerie Beral; Paul Burton; John Danesh; Paul Downey; Paul Elliott; Jane Green; Martin Landray; Bette Liu; Paul Matthews; Giok Ong; Jill Pell; Alan Silman; Alan Young; Tim Sprosen; Tim Peakman; Rory Collins
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool.

Authors:  Rebekah E McWhirter; Christine R Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Don Chalmers; Tess Whitton; Margaret Otlowski; Michael M Burgess; Joanne L Dickinson
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-11-20

10.  Sociocultural variation in attitudes toward use of genetic information and participation in genetic research by race in the United States: implications for precision medicine.

Authors:  Timothy Dye; Dongmei Li; Margaret Demment; Susan Groth; Diana Fernandez; Ann Dozier; Jack Chang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  47 in total

1.  Grudging Trust and the Limits of Trustworthy Biorepository Curation.

Authors:  Karen M Meagher; Eric T Juengst; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  The Role of the Health Care Provider in Building Trust Between Patients and Precision Medicine Research Programs.

Authors:  Anitra Persaud; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.

Authors:  Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Stephanie M Fullerton; Aliya Saperstein; Janet K Shim
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  African genetic diversity and adaptation inform a precision medicine agenda.

Authors:  Luisa Pereira; Leon Mutesa; Paulina Tindana; Michèle Ramsay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Preferences for the research use of electronic health records among young adults with fragile X syndrome or autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Laura Wagner; MaryKate Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Sara Andrews; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Alexandra Alvarez Rivas; Anne Wheeler; Melissa Raspa
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.554

Review 6.  International Society of Psychiatric Genetics Ethics Committee: Issues facing us.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Maya Sabatello; Laura Huckins; Holly Peay; Franziska Degenhardt; Bettina Meiser; Todd Lencz; Takahiro Soda; Anna Docherty; David Crepaz-Keay; Jehannine Austin; Roseann E Peterson; Lea K Davis
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 7.  Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data.

Authors:  Maui Hudson; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Rogena Sterling; Nadine R Caron; Keolu Fox; Joseph Yracheta; Jane Anderson; Phil Wilcox; Laura Arbour; Alex Brown; Maile Taualii; Tahu Kukutai; Rodney Haring; Ben Te Aika; Gareth S Baynam; Peter K Dearden; David Chagné; Ripan S Malhi; Ibrahim Garba; Nicki Tiffin; Deborah Bolnick; Matthew Stott; Anna K Rolleston; Leah L Ballantyne; Ray Lovett; Dominique David-Chavez; Andrew Martinez; Andrew Sporle; Maggie Walter; Jeff Reading; Stephanie Russo Carroll
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Perspectives on Precision Medicine in a Tribally Managed Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Julie A Beans; R Brian Woodbury; Kyle A Wark; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Paul Spicer
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-09-17

9.  "Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record.

Authors:  Sara M Andrews; Melissa Raspa; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Lauren Turner-Brown; Laura Wagner; Alexandra Alvarez Rivas; Mary Katherine Frisch; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  In Different Voices: The Views of People with Disabilities about Return of Results from Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Yuan Zhang; Ying Chen; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.