Literature DB >> 31913479

"Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record.

Sara M Andrews1, Melissa Raspa1, Anne Edwards1, Rebecca Moultrie2, Lauren Turner-Brown3, Laura Wagner2, Alexandra Alvarez Rivas4, Mary Katherine Frisch3, Anne C Wheeler1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand the ethical, legal, and social issues described by parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions that cause intellectual and developmental disabilities regarding research use of their child's electronic health record (EHR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted 4 focus groups with parents of children with a known (n = 12) or suspected (n = 11) genetic condition, as well as 2 comparison groups with parents who had a child with no known genetic condition (n = 15). Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using directed content analysis.
RESULTS: After weighing the risks and benefits, parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions were willing to share their child's EHR for research studies under certain conditions. Preferences were for studies conducted by universities or nonprofits that might benefit their child or others with the same condition. Parents also valued return of research results. DISCUSSION: Trust, transparency, altruism, and concerns about privacy emerged as factors that affect parents' willingness to allow research use of their child's EHR.
CONCLUSION: Researchers should consider how to build trust with parents by increasing transparency of the research process and explaining specifically how they will ensure the confidentiality of EHR data.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomedical ethics; clinical research; electronic health records; human genetics; intellectual and developmental disability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31913479      PMCID: PMC7025353          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  37 in total

1.  Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Janice L Krieger; Dorothy Hagmajer; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Joy L Pritts; Michael A Neblo; Rosemarie J Kalarickal; John W Creswell; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Improving Public Health Requires Inclusion of Underrepresented Populations in Research.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information.

Authors:  David Grande; Nandita Mitra; Anand Shah; Fei Wan; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Clinical research for rare disease: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Robert C Griggs; Mark Batshaw; Mary Dunkle; Rashmi Gopal-Srivastava; Edward Kaye; Jeffrey Krischer; Tan Nguyen; Kathleen Paulus; Peter A Merkel
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.797

6.  Prevalence and characteristics of children with autism-spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Joyce S Nicholas; Jane M Charles; Laura A Carpenter; Lydia B King; Walter Jenner; Eve G Spratt
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Disability inclusion in precision medicine research: a first national survey.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Yuan Zhang; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mhairi Aitken; Jenna de St Jorre; Claudia Pagliari; Ruth Jepson; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Precision medicine, health disparities, and ethics: the case for disability inclusion.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.

Authors:  Pauline McCormack; Anna Kole; Sabina Gainotti; Deborah Mascalzoni; Caron Molster; Hanns Lochmüller; Simon Woods
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maternal Perceptions of Safeguards for Research Involving Children.

Authors:  Maryam Rostami; Jane Paik Kim; Laura Turner-Essel; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2021-08-07

2.  Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Ryan S Paquin; Derek S Brown; Sara Andrews; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Wagner; MaryKate Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  How hospitals in mainland China responded to the outbreak of COVID-19 using information technology-enabled services: An analysis of hospital news webpages.

Authors:  Aihua Yan; Yi Zou; Dinesh A Mirchandani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.