Literature DB >> 31124312

International Society of Psychiatric Genetics Ethics Committee: Issues facing us.

Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz1, Maya Sabatello2, Laura Huckins3, Holly Peay4, Franziska Degenhardt5, Bettina Meiser6, Todd Lencz7, Takahiro Soda8, Anna Docherty9, David Crepaz-Keay10, Jehannine Austin11, Roseann E Peterson12, Lea K Davis13.   

Abstract

Psychiatric genetics research is improving our understanding of the biological underpinnings of neurodiversity and mental illness. Using psychiatric genetics in ways that maximize benefits and minimize harms to individuals and society depends largely on how the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of psychiatric genetics are managed. The International Society of Psychiatric Genetics (ISPG) is the largest international organization dedicated to psychiatric genetics. Given its history, membership, and international reach, we believe the ISPG is well-equipped to contribute to the resolution of these ELSI challenges. As such, we recently created the ISPG Ethics Committee, an interdisciplinary group comprised of psychiatric genetics researchers, clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, mental health professionals, patients, patient advocates, bioethicists, and lawyers. This article highlights key ELSI challenges identified by the ISPG Ethics Committee to be of paramount importance for the ethical translation of psychiatric research into society in three contexts: research settings, clinical settings, and legal proceedings. For each of these arenas, we identify and discuss pressing psychiatric genetics ELSI dilemmas that merit attention and require action. The goal is to increase awareness about psychiatric genetics ELSI issues and encourage dialogue and action among stakeholders.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELSI; ethics; genetics; psychiatry; testing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31124312      PMCID: PMC6861601          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet        ISSN: 1552-4841            Impact factor:   3.568


  110 in total

Review 1.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for adult-onset disorders. An update for clinicians.

Authors:  B Meiser; M A Gleeson; K M Tucker
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  The genomic era and perceptions of psychotic disorders: genetic risk estimation, associations with reproductive decisions and views about predictive testing.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin; Geoffrey N Smith; William G Honer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.568

3.  Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Katherine Gillespie; Meghan Halley; Nina Varsava; Kelly E Ormond; Harold S Luft; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Return of results and data to study participants.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Teneille R Brown; James Tabery
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Issues concerning feedback about genetic testing and risk of depression.

Authors:  Kay Wilhelm; Bettina Meiser; Philip B Mitchell; Adam W Finch; Jennifer E Siegel; Gordon Parker; Peter R Schofield
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Effects of attributing serious mental illnesses to genetic causes on orientations to treatment.

Authors:  Jo C Phelan; Lawrence H Yang; Rosangely Cruz-Rojas
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input From Stakeholders to Inform Research.

Authors:  Yvonne A Joosten; Tiffany L Israel; Neely A Williams; Leslie R Boone; David G Schlundt; Charles P Mouton; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; Consuelo H Wilkins
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Marco Scutari; Ian Mackay; David Balding
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Generalization and dilution of association results from European GWAS in populations of non-European ancestry: the PAGE study.

Authors:  Christopher S Carlson; Tara C Matise; Kari E North; Christopher A Haiman; Megan D Fesinmeyer; Steven Buyske; Fredrick R Schumacher; Ulrike Peters; Nora Franceschini; Marylyn D Ritchie; David J Duggan; Kylee L Spencer; Logan Dumitrescu; Charles B Eaton; Fridtjof Thomas; Alicia Young; Cara Carty; Gerardo Heiss; Loic Le Marchand; Dana C Crawford; Lucia A Hindorff; Charles L Kooperberg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.

Authors:  Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Leslie G Biesecker; Valentina Di Francesco; Carla L Easter; Elise A Feingold; Adam L Felsenfeld; David J Kaufman; Elaine A Ostrander; William J Pavan; Adam M Phillippy; Anastasia L Wise; Jyoti Gupta Dayal; Britny J Kish; Allison Mandich; Christopher R Wellington; Kris A Wetterstrand; Sarah A Bates; Darryl Leja; Susan Vasquez; William A Gahl; Bettie J Graham; Daniel L Kastner; Paul Liu; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Benjamin D Solomon; Vence L Bonham; Lawrence C Brody; Carolyn M Hutter; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Evidence-Update.

Authors:  Gwyneth Zai
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021

3.  Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Lasse Folkersen; Oliver Pain; Andrés Ingason; Thomas Werge; Cathryn M Lewis; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Laura Torgerson; Hadley Stevens Smith; Stacey Pereira
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.